Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Congress to take on billions in duplicative programs
Thursday - 4/19/2012, 5:32pm EDT
The bill is co-sponsored by Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and Reps. Sue Myrick (R-N.C.), James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.).
"I take very seriously Congress's role in overseeing and reforming laws to ensure that the federal government is more accountable and efficient," Udall said in a press release. "This amendment will allow us to go a step further in making certain that new federal programs don't duplicate old ones. In the long run, we will save taxpayer dollars, cut government waste and redundancies, and change the culture in Washington."
The Congressional Research Service would analyze all new legislation to determine any overlap in existing federal programs, offices or initiatives with similar goals or activities. If a similarity is found, the bill would be given a "duplication score" and require an explanation from the committee for why the new federal entity is necessary.
Legislation that addresses an emergency situation would be exempt.
In a joint statement, the lawmakers cited several instances from the GAO report of duplicative spending they'd like to eliminate, including:
- 209 programs covering science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, administered by 13 federal agencies at a cost of $3 billion annually
- 160 programs and tax expenditures run by 20 federal entities related to housing assistance
- 14 programs and three tax expenditures to reduce diesel emissions
The Senate has twice voted down similar legislation, once in 2011, and again in 2012, several weeks before the release of the GAO report.