Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
GAO: Long-term savings, short-term hurdle in dollar coin switch
Monday - 2/20/2012, 6:19pm EST
But while the transition would spell savings over the long haul, the effort to ramp up initial production of the coins would actually result in a net loss of about $531 million over the first 10 years of production.
Lorelei St James, the director of physical infrastructure issues at the Government Accountability Office, joined In Depth with Francis Rose to discuss GAO's review of the bill vs. the coin.
GAO's latest report is an update to a March 2011 review. The watchdog agency's report hinges on the arcane formula of "seigniorage," the difference between the cost of producing currency and its face value.
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), the ranking member of a Senate subcommittee on federal financial management, requested the latest examination. However, he did not appear to be convinced by the report's evidence of cost-savings.
"This report is crystal clear about one thing: the unwieldy dollar coin is more expensive than the popular dollar bill, even over the long run," he said. "The dollar bill will continue to be the more cost-effective currency to produce and use."
Brown noted the long length of time it would take to recoup costs as well as the need to replace bills on a 1.5 to 1 basis.
The reason GAO used a 30-year time frame to measure savings because that is about the lifecycle of coin currency, St. James said.
GAO didn't present a formal recommendation in either of the two reports. "But we stand by the feeling that there is a benefit over time if you do replace a $1 note with a $1 coin," St. James added.