Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
GAO: Agencies lack risk management in service contracts
Monday - 1/9/2012, 8:21pm EST
Federal News Radio
Service contracts now make up half of all federal contracts — the result of a 44 percent increase over the past five years. But this rapid rise has led the Government Accountability Office to issue a warning sign of sorts.
Professional- and management-support service contracting obligations at civilian agencies. (GAO chart)
"Many of these services increase the risk that contractors may inappropriately influence the government's authority, control and accountability for inherently governmental decisions," GAO found in its latest report on managing service contracts.
John Hutton, the director of acquisition and sourcing management issues at GAO, joined In Depth with Francis Rose to discuss the watchdog agency's latest report.
In the report, GAO reviewed five agencies:
- Homeland Security Department
- Transportation Department
- Housing and Urban Development Department
- U.S. Agency for International Development
- National Science Foundation
The issue boils down to definitions of "inherently governmental," as so many acquisition issues do. The difference between a contractor closely supporting the government and actually performing a job intended to be done by the government is a "very fine distinction," Hutton said.
For example, he said, providing acquisition support or budget analyses, are examples of work that while not inherently governmental, are "closely supporting," he added. "And that's where the risk, I think, presents itself: Does the government have the capacity, does it have the good understanding, that in those situations, they're considering the risks and taking appropriate action?"