Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- Improving Healthcare Outcomes through IT Policy
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
Government-led contests work best in procurement
Thursday - 8/12/2010, 4:00pm EDT
Government-led contests are popping up all across federal agencies to help increase government procurement and performance.
The EPA and OMB are a few agencies recently trying them out.
But do they work?
Steve Kelman, Professor of Public Management at the Kennedy School at Harvard University, says in the appropriate circumstance, a contest is a great way to generate ideas and, above all, to pay only for results.
"The basic idea is you set out a goal and you give a prize. Either you give out the prize to the first person who reaches the goal...or you give a prize to the best one," says Kelman.
Contests should be used a procurement technique, he says, much more than they are being used now.
"Compared to a normal procurement, the agency doesn't have to choose the team they're going to go with," says Kelman. "As many people who want to participate get to make their entrance."
With contests, agencies save on administrative costs - expenses for source selection, bid protests, contract administration, auditors and checkers are nonexistant.
And they also eliminate much of the suspicion surrounding bureacracy in the procurement process, says Kelman.
But, there are certain downfalls - for example, if no one enters the contest to begin with. And there are instances where contests do not work, especially in cases where traditional companies are submitting the prize applications.
Kelman says these companies will often not invest a large amount of time and resources into a risky, competitive bid that is not guaranteed, unless the award is profound.
Contests are most appropriate in circumstances that are innovative and speculative, says Kelman.
Situations with nontraditional players also tend to be appropriate, "for example, when the EPA invites the kids of America to develop a public service announcement on various kinds of environmental things, and they give a prize of $2,500 - essentially no money. You couldn't get a conventional company to develop a PSA of any quality for $2,500," says Kelman.
Essentially, contests are successful because of what Kelman refers to as the "cool factor" - it's for people and organizations who just think it's cool to try an idea out.
Read more from Kelman's blog here.
Email the author of this post at email@example.com.