Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- Improving Healthcare Outcomes through IT Policy
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
1988 Supreme Court case prevents security clearance challenges
Thursday - 1/26/2012, 7:09am EST
But this employee may never have his day in court because of a 1988 Supreme Court case.
In Department of Navy vs. Egan, a federal employee objected to his security clearance being revoked. The court decided it was up to the executive branch to make the decision about the merits of a security clearance denial.
Federal employees can object to the process of a clearance denial opposed to the merit, said Debra Roth, partner at Shaw, Bransford and Roth, in an interview with The Federal Drive with Tom Temin.
Federal employees and contractors can take up their case with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Merit Systems Protection Board, she said.
The NGA employee, however, did not challenge the clearance based on process but on the merit of the denial, she said.
"I do think that these security clearance cases that are raising constitutional challenges are probably headed by up to the [Supreme] Court," Roth said.