Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
1988 Supreme Court case prevents security clearance challenges
Thursday - 1/26/2012, 7:09am EST
But this employee may never have his day in court because of a 1988 Supreme Court case.
In Department of Navy vs. Egan, a federal employee objected to his security clearance being revoked. The court decided it was up to the executive branch to make the decision about the merits of a security clearance denial.
Federal employees can object to the process of a clearance denial opposed to the merit, said Debra Roth, partner at Shaw, Bransford and Roth, in an interview with The Federal Drive with Tom Temin.
Federal employees and contractors can take up their case with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Merit Systems Protection Board, she said.
The NGA employee, however, did not challenge the clearance based on process but on the merit of the denial, she said.
"I do think that these security clearance cases that are raising constitutional challenges are probably headed by up to the [Supreme] Court," Roth said.