Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
1988 Supreme Court case prevents security clearance challenges
Thursday - 1/26/2012, 7:09am EST
But this employee may never have his day in court because of a 1988 Supreme Court case.
In Department of Navy vs. Egan, a federal employee objected to his security clearance being revoked. The court decided it was up to the executive branch to make the decision about the merits of a security clearance denial.
Federal employees can object to the process of a clearance denial opposed to the merit, said Debra Roth, partner at Shaw, Bransford and Roth, in an interview with The Federal Drive with Tom Temin.
Federal employees and contractors can take up their case with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the Merit Systems Protection Board, she said.
The NGA employee, however, did not challenge the clearance based on process but on the merit of the denial, she said.
"I do think that these security clearance cases that are raising constitutional challenges are probably headed by up to the [Supreme] Court," Roth said.