Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
The White House does not support blowing up planets
Saturday - 1/12/2013, 12:02am EST
Rachel Nania, wtop.com
WASHINGTON - On Jan. 11, the White House responded to a petition posted on its website in regards to securing funds to construct a Death Star.
The official letter, titled "This is not the Petition Response You're Looking For," highlights three key reasons why it is not feasible for the federal government to fund a Death Star.
First, the response from petitions.whitehouse.gov says that construction of a Death Star is estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000, a number cited from a student-run economics blog at Lehigh University.
"We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it," says Paul Shawcross, the letter's author and chief of the Science and Space Branch at the White House Office of Management and Budget.
Second, the letter states that the Administration does not support blowing up planets. Rather, the country prefers to explore them.
"We are discovering hundreds of new planets in other star systems and building a much more powerful successor to the Hubble Space Telescope that will see back to the early days of the universe," Shawcross says in the letter.
For his third point, Shawcross flexes his "Star Wars" knowledge.
"Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?" he asks.
The letter also states that the U.S. already has something large floating in the sky - the International Space Station - and that is enough.
The original petition to build a Death Star was created on Nov. 14, 2012 and received 34,435 signatures.
The petition argued that funneling defense resources into a "space- superiority platform and weapon system" could increase domestic jobs in construction, space exploration and engineering.
Shawcross, instead, encourages the author to pursue a career in a science or technology-related field and contribute to the future of space.
"The Force will be with us," he says. "Remember, the Death Star's power to destroy a planet, or even a whole star system, is insignificant next to the power of the Force."
Follow @WTOP on Twitter.
(Copyright 2013 by WTOP. All Rights Reserved.)