Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Army not spending extra on LEED certifications, official says
Wednesday - 5/23/2012, 9:21am EDT
Katherine Hammack, the assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy and environment, said she thinks Congress might be confused about the issue.
"We are not spending any extra money on LEED Gold or LEED Platinum certification," she said. "Our goal and our contracts are all asking for LEED Silver level certification. I think what confuses Congress at times is a project might achieve LEED Gold certification when it was driving toward LEED Silver."
Projects can earn extra points by going above and beyond the LEED program, Hammack added.
Terry Yonkers, the assistant secretary for installations, environment and logistics, said that while all the military services are building green buildings, they're not doing it just to be green.
"These are business decisions, and this is a business case," Yonkers said. "We're building to LEED Silver because it saves energy and it saves money."
Notwithstanding the Congressional prohibition, Hammack said the Army has never pursued anything above the LEED Silver level anyway, because it found there's no business case for the extra costs involved in going after LEED Gold or Platinum.
This story is part of Federal News Radio's daily DoD Report brought to you by United Health Military and Veterans Services. For more defense news, click here.