Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
Army not spending extra on LEED certifications, official says
Wednesday - 5/23/2012, 9:21am EDT
Katherine Hammack, the assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy and environment, said she thinks Congress might be confused about the issue.
"We are not spending any extra money on LEED Gold or LEED Platinum certification," she said. "Our goal and our contracts are all asking for LEED Silver level certification. I think what confuses Congress at times is a project might achieve LEED Gold certification when it was driving toward LEED Silver."
Projects can earn extra points by going above and beyond the LEED program, Hammack added.
Terry Yonkers, the assistant secretary for installations, environment and logistics, said that while all the military services are building green buildings, they're not doing it just to be green.
"These are business decisions, and this is a business case," Yonkers said. "We're building to LEED Silver because it saves energy and it saves money."
Notwithstanding the Congressional prohibition, Hammack said the Army has never pursued anything above the LEED Silver level anyway, because it found there's no business case for the extra costs involved in going after LEED Gold or Platinum.
This story is part of Federal News Radio's daily DoD Report brought to you by United Health Military and Veterans Services. For more defense news, click here.