Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Hagel shakes up Pentagon's organizational chart, hopes for $1B in savings
Wednesday - 12/4/2013, 3:30pm EST
Correction: An earlier version of this story inaccurately reported that the positions of DoD Deputy Chief Management Officer and Assistant Deputy Chief Management Officer were vacant. Kevin Scheid is currently serving as assistant DCMO and the office's interim leader. — Dec. 7, 2013 -10:14 a.m.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel moved Wednesday to eliminate several high-level Pentagon positions, consolidate offices and change the responsibilities of a number of organizations within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as part of a pledge to reduce the Pentagon's headquarters headcount by 20 percent.
The implementation plans he announced Wednesday followed his July directive to pare back Defense Department back-offices strewn around the world and a promise that his office would be the first in the process.
"Much of these savings will be achieved through contractor reductions, although there will be reductions in civilian personnel," Hagel said. "Ultimately, other headquarters elements will be implementing similar reductions, and we will detail our plans to achieve these savings in the Pentagon's budget submission next year."
The changes come after a study of the DoD bureaucracy led by former Air Force Secretary Michael Donley. The department says the planned changes would reduce OSD's military and civilian headcount to 2,200 by fiscal 2019 and save about $1 billion.
In historical terms, that's not a huge retrenchment. It still would leave OSD with hundreds more headquarters staff than it had on Sept. 11, 2001. And it's about the same number of personnel OSD had in 2009, when military funding was at its peak, according to figures compiled by the Defense Business Board. The DBB's numbers showed that OSD's staff count was more than 5,000 when it included contractor personnel.
Mergers and acquisitions
Perhaps more significant is the organizational realignment Hagel ordered to accommodate the reductions.
Some elements of the plan would require Congressional approval, such as the added responsibilities Hagel wants to place under DoD's deputy chief management officer and its chief information officer.
Under the restructuring, the DoD CIO would take over DCMO's current responsibilities for overseeing the development of business IT systems.
"I will work with Congress to make this change because it will strengthen DoD's ability to address growing IT and cyber challenges," Hagel said. "The undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics will continue to be responsible for acquisition of IT systems."
But DCMO also would take on greater heft. The plan merges the Defense Civil Liberties and Privacy office with the assistant to the secretary of Defense for intelligence oversight. That combined organization would be placed under the DCMO. So would the quasi-independent office of DoD's director for administration and management (DA&M), which handles administration and security of the Pentagon itself, numerous other facilities in the D.C. region and many other administrative issues for the department writ-large.
Hagel said the changes finally would make the DCMO the true focal point for management issues in the Defense Department.
"Secretary Donley's review found that since its inception, the DCMO has lacked the resources and the mandate to effectively fulfill its role as a DoDwide manager," Hagel said. "Meanwhile, the DA&M and others have important organizational management planning and oversight functions across the department and the national capital region that will further enable the DCMO's work. The consolidation of these offices into a true DoDwide management office will provide for better coordination and integration of DoD's business affairs, including performance management and compliance, and result in a much stronger and more empowered deputy chief management officer."
Policy realignment proposed
DoD's first-ever DCMO, Beth McGrath, retired last week after 25 years in the department. The office's number two executive, Dave Wennergren, departed DoD in August. Wennergren's replacement, Kevin Scheid, is leading the office until a new deputy chief management officer is appointed.
Congress has its own ideas about how the CIO and DCMO offices should work. A provision in the Senate Armed Services Committee's version of the annual DoD authorization bill would simply merge the two offices.
Hagel also directed a significant realignment of the office of the undersecretary of Defense for policy. For example, the jobs of the deputy undersecretary for plans and forces and chief of staff to the undersecretary will disappear.
"The plan also eliminates four deputy assistant secretary of Defense positions and their corresponding support structures through a consolidation and realignment of the policy staff overall structure," Hagel said.
The restructuring of DoD's policy shop mostly moves responsibilities to lower- level assistant secretaries of Defense. But the policy undersecretary will also take in the Office of Net Assessment, an internal DoD think tank that had previously worked directly for the Defense secretary. The decision comes as good news to ONA backers who had feared that the office would be eliminated entirely.