Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
House OKs 2-year sentence for military sex assault
Friday - 6/14/2013, 5:00am EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Angered by the epidemic of sexual assault in the military, the House on Thursday endorsed a mandatory minimum sentence of two years in prison for a member of the armed services convicted of rape or sexual assault in a military court.
By voice vote, the House approved the additional punishment as part of a series of steps lawmakers have taken to tackle the growing problem of sexual assault. The provisions are contained in a sweeping defense policy bill for the 2014 fiscal year beginning Oct. 1.
"Being in a military uniform should not be a get out of jail card," Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, said as the House began work on more than 170 amendments to the defense bill.
Lawmakers hope to complete the measure on Friday but must reconcile it with a Senate version.
Congress is determined to shake up the military's culture and give victims of sexual assault the confidence that if they report a crime their allegations won't be dismissed or they won't face retaliation.
The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said Thursday the panel had approved its 2014 defense policy bill and it included a provision requiring an automatic review by an individual higher in the chain of command should a commander decide not to prosecute an allegation of sexual assault. The committee's bill also would make it a crime to retaliate against victims who report a sexual assault, and would strip commanders of the authority to dismiss court-martial convictions.
Levin called the automatic review provision "a very significant protection and assurance of the seriousness with which allegations are going to be taken, and not simply swept under the rug by a lawyer or by anybody."
Last week, the House Armed Services Committee approved provisions in the defense bill which included stripping military commanders of the power to overturn convictions in rape and sexual assault cases. The panel also voted to require that anyone found guilty of a sex-related crime receive a punishment that includes, at a minimum, a dismissal from military service or a dishonorable discharge.
Officers, commissioned warrant officers, cadets and midshipmen convicted of rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy or attempts to commit those offenses would be dismissed under a mandatory minimum sentence. Enlisted personnel and non-commissioned warrant officers convicted of similar crimes would be dishonorably discharged.
Turner and other lawmakers argued on Thursday that they needed to add a minimum sentence to that punishment.
"Unfortunately under current law, if you commit a sexual assault on a base that's in a state that first-degree sexual assault has a mandatory minimum, you might actually avoid a mandatory minimum. And that has happened," Turner said.
Several Democratic women opposed the step, arguing that while confinement was appropriate, Congress should wait for a Defense Department report on sentencing guidelines.
Rep. Niki Tsongas, D-Mass., who worked with Turner in crafting several of the provisions, broke with her colleague on the amendment, saying it was premature until the Pentagon report.
The Pentagon estimated recently that as many as 26,000 military members may have been sexually assaulted last year, up from an estimated 19,000 assaults in 2011, based on an anonymous survey of military personnel. While the number of sexual assaults that members of the military actually reported rose 6 percent to 3,374 in 2012, thousands of victims were still unwilling to come forward despite new oversight and assistance programs aimed at curbing the crimes, the report said.
Reflecting the nation's war-weariness, the House overwhelmingly backed an amendment supporting President Barack Obama's plans for withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014 while urging the administration to speed up the timetable if possible. The amendment also includes non-binding language that recommends Congress vote to authorize the presence of any U.S. troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014.
The vote was 305-121.
"We should not allow another American to die in Afghanistan unless we vote on the policy," said Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., one of co-sponsors of the amendment. "The American people want our troops out."
The U.S. has trained hundreds of thousands of Afghan security forces and it is time to turn over the responsibility of defending the country to the Afghan government, said Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., another of the amendment's co-sponsors.
"It will always be a challenging part of the world, in both Afghanistan and Pakistan. Violent extremists are abundant in both places, and we'll have to keep an eye on it," said Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee. "But we do not need to have the troop levels that we have now."