Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Is military retirement still third-rail issue
Wednesday - 10/26/2011, 7:36am EDT
In fact, just this week at at a House subcommittee hearing on military retiree benefits, Pentagon officials countered that the system in place is affordable and is not the main driver of the department's quickly ballooning personnel costs.
That assessment stands in contrast to the findings of an advisory group, the Defense Business Board, which reported this summer that retirement costs could eventually crowd the department's warfighting capability. It recommended a pension system modeled on a traditional private-sector 401(k) style-plan.
Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, joined the Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Amy Morris to discuss changes to military retirement.
Harrison recently co-authored a report, "Changing the Business of Defense," which called for DoD to really assess what its service members need in a retirement plan.
The current system, TRICARE for Life, only benefits about 17 military personnel because of the 20 years of military service required to qualify for the program.
"Instead of using a one-size-fits-all approach, options could be developed that allow service members to choose among benefits to improve their perceived value while reducing costs," Harrison wrote in the report.
This story is part of Federal News Radio's daily DoD Report. For more defense news, click here.