Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Colorado's marijuana industry: Legal, not cheap
Wednesday - 8/21/2013, 3:08am EDT
DENVER (AP) -- Want to be in the legal pot industry in Colorado? Open your checkbook.
Colorado's pot regulators opened three days of hearings Tuesday to lay out licensing specifics before retail sales begin in January.
The proposed rules require would-be "ganjapreneurs" to pay up to $5,000 just to apply to be in the recreational pot business. Operational licenses cost another $2,750 to $14,000. Those who want to sell both medical and recreational pot would have to pay double.
Successful applicants must also pass a gauntlet of criminal background checks and residency requirements.
The result is expected to be an industry that will have as much red tape as green leaves. Colorado is trying to show it can strictly regulate and control a drug that has been operating in the shadows for decades, despite the advent of medical marijuana more than a decade ago.
Officials say steep application fees are needed to properly screen marijuana workers, checking fingerprints and screening out recent drug felons and people with possible ties to criminal drug cartels.
Colorado will also be screening future marijuana businesses to make sure no owners live out of state, a requirement set forth by state lawmakers earlier this year. The residency requirements -- which apply from owners all the way down to so-called "bud-tenders" who man the counters and measure out marijuana -- are a holdover from Colorado's existing medical marijuana industry.
The hefty operational license fees, according to state officials, are needed to pay for enforcement of the nascent industry. Plans call for an ambitious seed-to-sale tracking system in which Colorado will require video surveillance of all plants as they grow and are prepared, packaged and sold to customers.
The Department of Revenue aimed to use seed-to-sale tracking for Colorado's medical marijuana business, but the agency ran out of money before getting the program fully operational. State officials said Tuesday they plan to have the plant-tracking system operational by October.
The Department wants to avoid a budget shortfall and tracking glitches in the larger recreational market, so operational fees are high. Retail stores will have to pay $3,750 to $14,000 a year, depending on their size. Growers will pay $2,750 a year.
Some in the industry complained Tuesday that Colorado is setting high fees before knowing what it will cost to enforce a brand-new industry. The marijuana industry is especially upset about double licensing fees faced by sellers of both recreational and medical pot.
Michael Elliott, head of the Denver-based Medical Marijuana Industry Group, complained that Colorado is charging steep fees with no "rational basis in the costs of enforcement."
He said pot shop owners should get a break on licensing fees if they want to sell pot to both medical patients, who will pay lower taxes and be able to buy up to 2 ounces, and recreational pot users, who must be over 21 and have lower purchasing limits.
"It's not going to cost twice as much to enforce the law at a dual-use facility. It's going to cost more, but not twice as much," Elliott said.
A patient advocate who's not in the industry complained that the regulation should require advanced notice if medical shops plan to stop selling medical pot.
Teri Robnett worried that many of Colorado's 600 or so medical marijuana shops will simply switch to all-recreational to avoid doubling their fees, leaving patients without a designated provider.
"Patients ultimately will suffer," she said.
Once the retail stores clear all the tests for state licensing, they're not done yet. Local governments can add their own layers of specialized licensing and zoning requirements, taking up to a year to review applications for would-be recreational pot shops. Local governments can also ban the retail sale of marijuana altogether, as many have already opted to do.
The state's final retail pot regulations will be final by mid-October. Retail sales may begin Jan. 1, though many municipalities including Denver may not be ready by then and will start recreational sales later.
Kristen Wyatt can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/APkristenwyatt
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.