Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
FDA panel split on safety of testosterone drug
Thursday - 4/18/2013, 5:58pm EDT
AP Health Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal health experts issued a split opinion Thursday on whether a long-acting testosterone injection from Endo Health Solutions is safe.
A Food and Drug Administration panel voted 9-9 on the safety of Endo's Aveed, a drug designed to be injected once every 10 weeks to boost testosterone in men with abnormally low levels. The FDA is not required to follow the group's advice, though it often does.
Endo has asked the FDA to approve its drug as a long-term treatment for hypogonadism, or low testosterone caused by disease or damage to the reproductive or hormonal organs. The condition is associated with fatigue, weight gain, depression and reduced libido.
Estimates for the number of men in the U.S. with low testosterone levels range from 5 million to 30 million, depending on the criteria used. While there are established numbers for typical testosterone levels in younger men, there is no consensus on what is a "normal number," in older men.
The split panel vote is the latest twist in Aveed's multiyear review by the FDA. The Malvern, Pa-based drugmaker first submitted the drug in 2007, but the FDA rejected it in 2008 and again in 2009. Regulators have continued to raise concerns about dangerous side effects associated with the injection.
Panelists who voted against the drug said the risks were not outweighed by the benefits of its long-lasting formulation.
"I felt the safety was not quite there yet -- admitting that we need a long-term preparation," said Dr. Bart Clarke, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
The Endo injection is to be taken once every 10 weeks, versus weekly or biweekly for currently available products.
Panelists who backed the drug pointed out that it has been approved in Europe since 2003 without any reports of death.
In review documents released earlier in the week, the FDA repeated its concerns about two types of problems seen in company studies: allergic reactions and micro embolisms.
The allergic reactions can cause painful skin symptoms, difficulty breathing and loss of consciousness. The embolisms can cause dangerous breathing problems when tiny droplets of oil from the injection travel to the lungs.
The company suggested those issues could be addressed with labeling instructions that doctors inject the drug "very slowly," and monitor patients for 30 minutes afterwards.
Panelists rejected that approach by a vote of 17 to 1 because it would not alleviate the risk of side effects.
The FDA also appeared to rule out the company's plan in its review.
"There are no known approaches to predict or prevent the occurrence of an Aveed-related severe post-injection reaction for any patient," the FDA stated in briefing documents posted Tuesday.
Drug companies have increasingly targeted low testosterone as a new market opportunity, running television and magazine ads about the impact of low testosterone on aging men.
Testosterone drug sales have increased 90 percent in the last five years to roughly $2 billion annually, mainly driven by new creams and gels, including Endo's Fortesta.
Shares of Endo Health Solutions Inc. fell 21 cents to close at $35.75.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.