Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Analysis: Dems hope for campaign edge on tax issue
Monday - 12/19/2011, 6:30pm EST
By CHARLES BABINGTON
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats feel they're closer than ever in their long-running bid to paint Republicans as being much more eager to cut taxes for the rich than for the working class.
But public contempt for Congress is so rampant that the effort may fade away in a pox-on-all-their-houses fog. If that happens, President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats could lose a political edge as they head into the 2012 elections with a struggling economy.
Democratic strategists say Republicans are blundering by refusing to extend a payroll tax cut, even after the Senate overwhelmingly approved a temporary compromise Saturday. GOP lawmakers previously fought hard to extend Bush-era income tax cuts for everyone, including the wealthiest.
"This is a rare moment when the public is with the Democrats on a tax issue, and against the Republicans," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.
Some conservative bloggers have urged Republican lawmakers to embrace the payroll tax cut extension, saying the GOP is identified with tax cuts.
Nonetheless, many congressional Republicans have either opposed the extension outright or demanded concessions strongly opposed by Democrats. Some think they won't pay a price.
Even if the impasse leads to a tax increase on wage earners in two weeks, Democrats will have a hard time convincing voters that they're the good guys and Republicans are the bad guys, said GOP strategist Rich Galen. Americans are so sick of congressional squabbling, he said, "they have tuned that kind of stuff out. I don't think anybody believes any of them anymore."
For the past few years, Republicans have fought hard to extend the Bush-era income tax cuts for everyone. Obama unsuccessfully tried to end those tax cuts for high-income people on schedule.
Republicans have taken a different tone on the payroll tax cut, which steers more proportional benefits to low- and middle-income workers.
At Obama's urging, Congress agreed last year to reduce the tax that nearly all wage earners pay toward Social Security. Long set at 6.2 percent, the levy was temporarily lowered to 4.2 percent for 2011. (A separate 6.2 percent paid by employers was unchanged).
Citing the bad economy, Obama said he wants to extend the payroll tax reduction for another year: all of 2012. Many GOP leaders balked, demanding concessions in return. Among other things, Republicans said a payroll tax cut must be offset by federal spending reductions elsewhere. They did not apply that condition when extending the Bush-era income tax cuts.
With the payroll tax scheduled to return to 6.2 percent on Jan. 1, the GOP-controlled House and Democratic-controlled Senate have been unable to reach an accord. The Senate approved a two-month extension of the lower rate last weekend and adjourned for the year, planning to revisit the matter in February.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Monday the House would reject the Senate plan and call on senators to return to the negotiating table. Senate Democratic leaders signaled no plans to do so.
House Republicans say it's foolish and cowardly to extend the payroll tax cut for only two months. Ed Goeas, a GOP pollster who has worked in presidential and congressional campaigns, predicts the public eventually will agree.
"Do the Democrats have a quick soundbite?" Goeas asked. "Absolutely." But voters see short-term fixes as gimmicks, he said, "and gimmicks turn them off."
Schumer said it's laughable for Republican lawmakers to say a two-month tax extension isn't enough after they spent months resisting any tax extension at all. "The American people are seeing through this," he said.
Numerous GOP lawmakers spoke against a payroll tax extension last summer and fall, before the debate reached a boil. "The payroll tax holiday has not stimulated job creation," Jon Kyl of Arizona, the Senate's second-ranking GOP leader, told "Fox News Sunday" on Nov. 27.
A spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said in August that Cantor has never believed a one-year tax reduction "is the best way to grow the economy."
Schumer said Democrats made numerous concessions in seeking Republican support for another year with a 4.2 percent payroll tax rate. They dropped Obama's bid for an even deeper cut, dropped Obama's bid for a surtax on millionaires to offset the payroll reduction and agreed to require Obama to make a swift decision on a proposed oil pipeline, which environmental groups oppose.
"They won't take `yes' for an answer," Schumer said.
Obama is using the tax issue to portray Republicans as being far more keen on protecting tax cuts for the rich than for low- and middle-income people.