Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Amgen to pay $762M settlement over drug marketing
Tuesday - 12/18/2012, 5:30pm EST
AP Business Writer
(AP) - Amgen Inc. has agreed to pay $762 million to resolve federal litigation accusing the drugmaker of marketing the anemia treatment Aranesp for unapproved uses.
The Thousand Oaks, Calif., company pleaded guilty Tuesday to illegally introducing a misbranded drug into interstate commerce and will pay a $136 million fine and a $14 million forfeiture, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York.
It also agreed to a $612 million civil settlement according to a law firm connected to the case.
But the U.S. attorney's office declined to comment on that because the civil settlement won't be unsealed until a Wednesday court hearing, when a federal judge also will decide whether to accept the plea and sentence in the criminal case.
Amgen said in an email that if the court accepts the plea and sentence, it will immediately resolve civil and criminal matters for which it had set aside $780 million last year. A company representative declined further comment on the plea agreement.
Amgen develops biologic medicines, or drugs produced by living cells rather than by mixing chemicals. Aranesp is approved for treating patients with anemia caused by chronic renal failure and chemotherapy.
The Food and Drug Administration approved the drug to be administered once a week or once every two or three weeks, depending on the patient. But prosecutors accused Amgen, among other things, of promoting a once-a-month dose to help Aranesp compete with Johnson & Johnson's Procrit, which was well-established in the market, according to federal court documents.
Amgen sales representative created a "Freedom Time" chart to show both doctors and patients how much time they could save if the drug was administered less frequently, the documents said. Sales representatives also used clinical studies to support the dosing, even though the FDA had found the studies insufficient to support its safety and effectiveness.
The guilty plea sends a message to the drug industry that "if you introduce misbranded drugs into interstate commerce, we will find you, prosecute you and hold you accountable," said Marshall Miller, who served as acting U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York for this case.
The agreement is the latest between the Justice Department and a drugmaker over allegations of improper marketing. Pharmaceutical companies aren't allowed to market drugs for unapproved uses, but the issue is far from clear cut.
Doctors can prescribe drugs for unapproved uses, and they say these prescriptions play a crucial role in treating patients, especially those with deadly illnesses and few treatment options.
And while drug companies can't market for off-label uses, their sales representatives can distribute copies of scientific journal articles that discuss off-label uses.
Amgen's settlement pales compared to what other big drugmakers have paid as the U.S. government has cracked down on industry tactics in recent years. In July, British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline PLC said it will pay $3 billion in fines for criminal and civil violations involving 10 drugs as part of the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history
In 2009, federal prosecutors hit Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drugmaker, with $2.3 billion in penalties tied to violations of federal drug rules.
The large settlements are smaller than the annual sales top blockbuster drugs can generate, but they generate bad publicity that drugmakers want to avoid, said Dr. Adriane Fugh-Berman, a Georgetown University professor. Fugh-Berman has served as a paid witness in court cases over drug marketing and started the watchdog website pharmedout.org, which details industry tactics.
"I like to think (settlements and fines) have some mitigating effect, but it's hard to gauge," she said.
Amgen shares fell 21 cents to close at $89.29 Tuesday, while the broader markets rose higher.
(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)