Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
GSA opens up possibility of FTS2001 extension
Thursday - 5/20/2010, 9:40pm EDT
By Jason Miller
Federal News Radio
The General Services Administration is opening up the possibility that the FTS2001 contract could be extended.
Steve Kempf, GSA's acting commissioner of the Federal Acquisition Service, tells lawmakers Thursday that the agency will decide early in 2011 whether the agencies will transition all their telecommunication services to the Networx contract by the June 2011 deadline.
"Most agencies will complete the transition by June 2011, but there may be some large data networks that may not be transitioned for two years or more," Kempf says during testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. "As we get closer, we will have to start negotiations well before the June 2011 deadline. I anticipate that whatever will be left over we will do a sole source contract or a bridge contract to allow rest to transition. We can't afford to have lines drop dead."
This is the first time GSA publicly announced that extending the FTS2001 contract is a possibility. Last November, GSA gave agencies a drop dead date to move to Networx.
In fact, Don Herring, AT&T's senior vice president for Government Solutions, says his company has had some informal conversations with GSA about a possible extension.
"We have a full year left and a lot can get done in a year," he says. "It's premature to say let's go on to a bridge contract at this point. Let's see how much we can get done over the next couple of months with the right focus and the right amount of resources we can get a lot done."
GSA told lawmakers that about 53 percent of all services have been moved to Networx from FTS2001. Kempf says GSA's goal it reach 75 percent by October.
But other vendors are not so sure it can be done even with the increased focus and attention from GSA, the Interagency Management Council (IMC), the Office of Management and Budget and Congress.
Susan Zeleniak, Verizon federal's group vice president, told lawmakers she is pessimistic about how the transition is going.
"What is expected to be done by June 2011 may be impossible because the volume of activity is staggering," she says. "We all agreed to get it done by June 2011 given current status will be quite difficult."
Witnesses offered numerous ideas for how to improve the chances of completing the Networx transition in the next 13 months.
Many say agencies must simplify and lower their overall expectations of what they can get from the contract in the short term.
Sanjeev Bhagowalia is the Interior Department's chief information officer and the chairman of the IMC, which is the Networx governance council for agencies.
He says agencies should get away from trying to take advantage of all 50 services under Networx, and just focus on making a one-for-one transition.
"Agencies need to have a solid inventory of their FTS 2001 services in order to do a like-for-like transition," Bhagowalia says. "You focus on one thing and get the job done."
Kempf adds that part of the reason for the IMC calling for this one-for-one approach is how late it is in the process.
"The time has passed for the opportunity for a lot of the options that are available and to carefully review the solicitation and go through with something that is more transformative," he says. "If they are not already there, it's a little late to do anything but a one-for-one at this point."
He adds that agencies could add more services in the long term, but the goal is to get the transition done by next summer.
Some vendors are concerned that if agencies do a like-for-like transition, they will miss out on opportunities to take advantage of newer technology.
Herring says, for example, if agencies want to exchange their data services one-for-one, they could would not use multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) and continue to use the older technology of frame relay.
Diane Gowen, Qwest's senior vice president and general manager, disagrees with Herring's assessment. She says Qwest's customers have been upgrading their networks throughout the FTS2001 contract.
"A lot of the delay in agencies getting statements of work out initially was because they were transitioning late in FTS to newer technologies and they wanted to get it done with and then they could move into Networx," she says.
Gowen would like to see other changes to speed up Networx transition, including increasing agency and industry dialogue, compare pricing or issue requests just for pricing, and if proposals are necessary, make them oral only.