Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Supplier quality management for federal agencies
Tuesday - 7/16/2013, 11:24pm EDT
The discussion centers around some of the unintended consequences of a budget reduction for federal information technology professionals.
The problem is simple: both civilian and defense agencies are having their budgets cut.
In other words, just like in a household budget, one will have to repair an existing car, rather than replacing it.
As a general rule, this is no problem.
The concern arises with electronic equipment that changes models quickly.
Cell phones are a terrific example.
The hardware changes so fast that the manufactures have a hard time keeping up with making the latest model.
How does an agency get replacement parts from a company that does not make parts anymore?
One solution is to go to the secondary market.
We are seeing countries like China buying up what is called "e-waste" and placing their own components in the parts.
An organization needs that part and gets it through a complex set of dealers and brokers and you end up with a military outfit with a compromised piece of equipment.
How can a manufacturer of electronic equipment be responsible for quality of parts that far down the road?
During the interview, Charles offers a solution, the Trusted Supplier Program.
In the commercial world his solution is classified as "supplier quality management."
Essentially, it assures purchasers that participating organizations have products that are authentic, genuine, and from the original manufacturer.