Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Analysis: Agency social media monitoring about good government, not Big Brother
Friday - 3/2/2012, 6:13pm EST
But Richard Hartman, the chief operating officer of OhMyGov Inc., which provides social media consulting to federal agencies and other clients, said Congress got it wrong. Lawmakers shouldn't have asked why DHS monitors social media networks, but why so few other agencies do not.
In a commentary for The Hill newspaper, Hartman said social media tracking isn't as nefarious as it seems and, in particular, serves three beneficial purposes:
- Improves situational awareness and aids in responding to emergencies.
- Can help identify disease patterns across geographic areas. Hartman cited the use of Twitter by Harvard Medical School to track a cholera epidemic.
- Public complaints and appraisals can serve as informal program evaluations.
Hartman joined In Depth with Francis Rose to discuss why social media monitoring is actually critical to many agency functions.