Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
Gov lessons from Facebook's 'like' tag
Tuesday - 3/8/2011, 5:29pm EST
Such a rating system could help government agencies evaluate everything from their service to the public to vendor performance, said Steve Kelman, professor of public management at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and former administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.
"The key is you gotta make it simpler or people won't do it," Kelman said in an interview with the DorobekINSIDER.
A disincentive now for agencies to obtain past performance on contractors are the "complex, bureaucratic forms," Kelman said.
However, if government agencies can simply click a thumbs up or down or rate a vendor on a scale of one to five, government customers get an instant snapshot of past performance, he said.
Another way to evaluate vendors is to include a rating system at the end of vouchers sent electronically. Agencies can rate how the vendor has performed that week, providing trend data that helps not only government customers but the contractors as well.
"If I were a contractor, I'd want this as an early warning signal," Kelman said.
Read Kelman's blog post in Federal Computer Week.