Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- Improving Healthcare Outcomes through IT Policy
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
Inside the Reporter's Notebook: GSA FAS, shared services and DHS contract awards
Friday - 1/11/2013, 6:50pm EST
Welcome to my new feature, "Inside the Reporter's Notebook," where every two weeks I'll dispatch news and information you may have missed or that slipped through the cracks at conferences, hearings and the like.
This is not a column nor commentary — it's news tidbits, strongly sourced buzz and other items of interest that have happened or are happening in the federal IT and acquisition communities.
As always, I encourage you to submit ideas, suggestions, and, of course, news to me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
There's a lot of talk in the acquisition community about who will be the next Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner at the General Services Administration. The buzz is around three names, Mary Davie, the acting FAS Commissioner and long-time GSA acquisition person, Tom Sharpe, the Treasury Department's chief acquisition officer, and, what some are calling an industry dark horse, Raj Sharma, CEO of Censeo Consulting Group, which has been working with GSA to implement strategic sourcing. Several sources tell me Davie is the best candidate, but from what I gather a decision isn't final.
A couple of data points for an industry friend to keep in mind:
- Government and industry say the past three FAS commissioners — Marty Wagner, Jim Williams, Steve Kempf — managed effectively. All of them had extensive prior federal acquisition operations and IT policy experience.
- When GSA has hired someone with mostly or all private-sector experience, they were selecting second tier candidates and things didn't work as well as they hoped, think Martha Johnson, Lurita Doan and Emily Murphy. "For the most part, they are good people, but they were over their heads and couldn't manage effectively in a government environment."
The Office of Management and Budget once again is trying to push agencies toward financial management shared services. At the Association of Government Accountants event Thursday, which was closed to the press for some odd reason, industry and government sources tell me OMB Controller Danny Werfel announced Treasury would be the agency lead for "shared services 2.0" (my name, not Werfel's). According to tweets from AGA, Werfel said the administration needs to aggressively challenge the agencies to find common, basic structures to take advantage of the cost benefits of migrating to shared services. Werfel also said, according to AGA tweets, medium and large agencies need to aggressively move toward shared services.
I've asked OMB for more details on the financial management shared services strategy, including an interview with Werfel. A recent Federal News Radio survey of CFOs found they are skeptical of shared services.
Under the Bush administration, OMB pushed agencies toward using shared services providers for financial management, but decided not to make it mandatory and therefore few large agencies actually made the move.
One industry source familiar with the plan tells me OMB may not be including the private sector in this round, instead wanting agencies to use government providers, such as Interior's National Business Center or Treasury's Administrative Resource Center. The source expressed some concern if that's the plan, government providers would struggle to meet the needs of truly large agencies such as Homeland Security or Veterans Affairs.
Here's another after-effect of the Defense Department's $1 billion failed personnel management systems, called, the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System (DIMHRS), the Air Force finally is updating its internal HR system five years later.
And the service is using the cloud. The Air Force said this week that it's putting its Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) in the cloud managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency.
For the next 23 days, MilPDS will go down while the Air Force moves it to DISA's Defense Enterprise Computing Center, known as the DISA DECs.
Moving to DISA's cloud isn't all that surprising as the Army, the Joint Chiefs and others are putting their email in the DECs, but this may be one of the first major HR systems going there.
It would be interesting to see if the Air Force's move to the cloud was more about a faster path to upgrades than actual savings.
The Air Force said it now will "bring MilPDS up-to-date in order to reduce risks."
"We are confident that we will be able to upgrade MilPDS in March so we can address security, reliability and sustainability risks with the current system," said Robert Corsi, Air Force assistant deputy chief of staff for manpower, personnel and services, in a release. "We will have processes in place to ensure personnel and pay service providers are able to work critical transactions for their customers during the upgrade."