Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Google, Onix withdrawal protest of Interior cloud email award
Tuesday - 9/27/2011, 6:57pm EDT
In fact, the situation becomes more intriguing as court documents are unclear about why Google and Onix dropped their lawsuit in the Court of Federal Claims.
"Based on the defendant's agreement to update its market research, a process that may include the issuance of a request for information, and then conduct a procurement subject to the availability of appropriated funds and in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation in a manner that would not preclude plaintiffs from fairly competing, plaintiffs respectfully move for dismissal of this action without prejudice," wrote the attorneys for Google and Onix in a motion filed Sept. 22.
The Justice Department lawyers a day later wrote to the court they didn't oppose the motion for withdrawal.
"However, in that motion, plaintiffs made reference to ‘defendant's agreement.' Defendant, the United States, hereby provides notice to the court that defendant has made no agreement as represented in that motion," the DoJ wrote.
Repeated requests for comments and clarifications to Google, Microsoft and Interior have not been answered.
Judge Susan Braden has not yet ruled on the Onix/Google motion to dismiss, according to the court's clerks office.
Last October, Interior chose Softchoice Corp. to provide email-as-a-service and other collaboration tools in the cloud featuring Microsoft products for its 80,000 employees.
Onix and Google protested the $59 million award alleging Interior didn't hold a fair and open competition.
Judge Braden issued a stay on the contract and said Interior violated the Competition in Contracting Act in January. Braden was expected to make a ruling soon before Google/Onix decided to ask for a dismissal of the case.