Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Is low agency attrition a bad thing?
Wednesday - 11/3/2010, 10:00pm EDT
Federal News Radio
A report released Wednesday said the cost of government attrition goes beyond dollar figures alone but can also have "significant consequences" on an agency's policies and programs.
The Partnership for Public Service and Booz Allen Hamilton conducted interviews and focus groups with more than 20 agencies for the study.
In general, federal attrition is low, at nearly 6 percent in 2009, below that of the private sector. Low attrition could be a sign that employees are satisfied with their jobs, but the statistics might mask another problem: The need for agencies to inject fresh thinking and innovation with new hires, according to the report.
The study found that government is losing too many new hires at the same time it's expected to experience a retirement "tsunami" in the coming years. More than 28 percent of the federal workforce was eligible to retire in fiscal year 2009. By 2015, the Office of Management and Budget estimates more than 48 percent of feds will be eligible to retire.