Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- Improving Healthcare Outcomes through IT Policy
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
Furloughs pose pitfalls for managers, rank-and-file feds
Monday - 2/18/2013, 4:31pm EST
But even if agencies are forced to go the furlough route, they will have to ensure the workforce reductions are implemented fairly or face a series of potential pitfalls.
Unionized federal employees — about 26.9 percent of the federal workforce — have the right to bargain over the "impact and implementation" of furloughs, said John Mahoney, chairman of Tully Rinckey's labor and employment practice group, in an interview on the Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Emily Kopp.
And, regardless whether an employee is covered by a union, all employees need to receive 30 days' notice and the opportunity to respond to notices, Mahoney said.
So the timeframe for when furloughs would actually be implemented (if sequestration goes into effect next month) would be pushed back to the end of April or even early May, Mahoney said.
Furloughs come with costly appeals process
"The goal is to try to roll this out in a way that has the least amount of impact on federal employees," Mahoney said.
But in doing so, managers need to make sure they follow all the rules and regulations relating to furloughs and take particular care that they are implemented equitably.
"If the furloughs are not implemented fairly [or] if an employee or a group of employees ... feel like the furloughs are not being applied equally across the board, they can file an Equal Employment Opportunity discrimination complaint," Mahoney said.
That could make the promised cost-savings more difficult to realize.
"Congress believes that these furloughs are going to save the government lots of money, but in reality they can lead to a very expensive complaint and appeals process across the board for these hundreds of thousands of employees who may be impacted by furloughs," Mahoney said.
To eliminate even the whiff of impropriety, managers should apply the furloughs to entire jobs series or grade levels as opposed to "picking and choosing" certain employees from various grades or job series, Mahoney said.
A logistical 'nightmare'
"This is something that has to be thought out well by the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management to determine how, exactly, they're going to implement these across-the-board furloughs," Mahoney said. "I mean, we're talking about hundreds of thousands of potential federal employees who may, at this point, lose up to 20 percent of their pay for a 30-day period or longer."
MSPB has previously published guidance on employee furloughs during government shutdowns stemming from lapsed spending bills.
But because sequestration furloughs would potentially ensnare nearly all federal employees — including those deemed "essential" — the furlough process becomes that much more complicated, Mahoney said.
"Logistically, it's going to be a nightmare, frankly, for all the federal agencies to put together their plans to furlough people fairly and meet congressional and presidential requirements, and that they do so effective March 1 if that deadline is not extended," Mahoney said.
Follow the latest news on sequestration with Federal News Radio's Sequestration Page. Check back every day for new articles and information on how sequestration will affect DoD, civilian agencies, and industry, as well as what Congress and the White House are doing to stop it.