Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Capitol Police ink up new restrictions on tattoos
Tuesday - 7/24/2012, 11:14am EDT
Capitol Police officials are considering new rules that would require officers to cover up their tattoos while on duty. Rank and officers worry that the rule is too subjective and would allow police leadership to decide which size and type of tattoo can skirt the long shirt and pants requirements.
Jon Adler, president of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, told The Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Emily Kopp that officers agree they should not display any body art that is obviously offensive.
Jon Adler, president, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association
"Do we sort of invoke a motion picture ratings system of well you can't have a rated 'R' or 'X' tattoo that might otherwise express some form of profanity, nudity, a partisan viewpoint maybe, certainly I hope we wouldn't have gang affiliation, but something that might suggest some sort of violence?" Adler said.
Adler is most concerned with a provision that would also limit the size of the tattoo. Tattoos that take up more than one-third of the area of a forearm or leg would have to be covered, he said.
He said changing the rules is unfair to incumbent officers, who may have existing tattoos that wouldn't meet the proposed rules.
Federal police must describe their tattoos and where they are located when they apply for the job. Some officers say they have been passed over for promotions because of their tattoos, Adler said.
"In law enforcement, we're defined by the honor in our heart and not the ink on our skin. Applying sort of consistency and fairness ultimately makes for good policy," Adler said.
Adler represents men and women working for 65 different federal agencies — most have general grooming policies, which typically don't specifically address tattoos.