Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
In the federal pay debate, 1 + 1 doesn't always equal 2
Thursday - 6/14/2012, 5:24am EDT
But some experts believe the source of angst — and disagreement — can be found in the different methodologies researchers use to formulate their conclusions.
On one hand, analysts at the Federal Salary Council based their conclusion that federal employees earned 26 percent less on average on a straight job-to-job comparison, which examines public and private sector salaries for similar positions.
That evaluation system "tends to be the model that all private sector jobs are classified under as well," said council member Rex Facer Wednesday at a Coalition for Effective Change panel discussion in Washington.
The job-to-job method is useful for determining whether agencies are giving federal employees "appropriate" salaries.
On the other hand, experts argue the council's method is too narrowly focused, instead preferring the "human capital approach," which factors in additional criteria, such as education and work experience.
"Economists tend to use the human capital model, [which has] had the best predictive power in terms of wages," said Andrew Biggs, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and co-author of a June 2011 federal and private sector pay comparison that used this approach. The study concluded federal workers earned 14 percent more salary than similar private sector employees.
A Congressional Budget Office study released Jan. 30 also incorporated the human capital approach, finding that overall, federal employees earned about 2 percent more in wages compared with similar workers in the private sector. When researchers factored in total compensation, including benefits, the number jumped to 16 percent.