Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Round up the usual suspects, again!
Thursday - 7/25/2013, 2:00am EDT
Feds face the prospect of even tougher times in 2014, which, in the government's fiscal year calendar, begins Oct. 1 of this year. The upcoming fiscal year, some experts believe, will be when sequestration's grip will really begin to tighten on the federal family jewels: Uncle Sam's pension plan and the cradle-to-grave, highly-subsidized federal health insurance program.
Defense says it might have to consider layoffs (RIFs). If it does, some other agencies will follow suit. Congress and the White House will also propose various legislative packages that feds won't like. Such as:
- Requiring workers and retirees to pay a bigger chunk of their health insurance premiums. Uncle Sam now pays about 72 cents of every premium dollar for non-postal workers and retirees. If a voucher system is implemented, many people would wind up either paying a much bigger chunk of their premiums or switching to a more affordable (but perhaps not as desirable) health plan.
- Reducing future cost of living adjustments for federal, military and Social Security retirees by as much as 0.4 percent a year.
- Increasing the percentage of salary that feds and postals kick into their CSRS or FERS retirement packages.
- Plus, a variety of perennial proposals — let's call them the Usual Suspects — that have frightened feds for decades. They keep coming back, as new members of Congress reinvent the legislative wheel and look for ways to cut government costs or permit them to play a therapeutic round of whack-a-mole with you — the bureaucrat — standing in for the mole.
While many feds have fixated on the long-threatened high-three to high-five switch, leaders of groups representing feds and retirees say the bigger danger — and the most likely to happen — is to the COLA portion of the retirement plans and to changes in who-pays-how-much for health insurance.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
Compiled by Nicole Ogrysko
Many historians believe America was named after Italian explorer Amerigo Vespucci. What's probably less known is that Vespucci sold pickles as his day job.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
VA, OPM implement promising
practices for next generation of SESers
More than two-thirds of all senior executive service members will be eligible for retirement in the next five years. And few agencies are doing enough to ensure the next generation of leaders are prepared for the SES ranks.
GSA, lawmakers favor
innovative approach to dispose of federal property
The General Services Administration believes public-private partnerships are more than just another tool in the real estate disposal toolbox. GSA officials say this approach may be one of the best ways to quicken the pace of disposal and reduce costs and waste.