Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Playing catch-up with health insurance
Thursday - 11/29/2012, 2:00am EST
In the past, many private-sector employers didn't offer health insurance to employees. Of those that did, many gave workers very limited choices and sometimes reduced benefits or boosted premiums (or both) when people retired.
While many feds find fault with the FEHBP, most nonfederal workers would be happy with the coverage, options and premium sharing deal in which the government pays about 70 percent of the total premium. Postal workers get an even better deal thanks to their union contract, which requires the USPS to pay even more of the total premium.
One of the arguments for health care reform, such as the ACA, was that ordinary Americans deserved the same coverage that is available to members of Congress (who are also under the FEHBP). They pay the same premiums and get the same coverage as rank-and-file feds in the same plans, except that representatives and senators do get VIP suites and treatment at several major military facilities like the old Bethesda Naval Hospital and Walter Reed.
In many instances, the incredibly complicated ACA law is based on the FEHBP program — except for the premium sharing.
Walton Francis, editor of the Checkbook's Guide To Federal Health Plans says everybody in the program should consider its positive strong points during the open enrollment period that ends Dec. 10. Among them:
- All employees, retirees and survivors can enroll in any plan they choose.
- Everyone can change plans once a year (during the Open Season) or at any other time if they get married, divorced, are widowed or have adopted a child. Children can be covered in a family plan up to age 26.
- If dependent children are seriously handicapped, they can be covered for life as part of a family plan, regardless of age.
- Long before the ACA, the federal program barred FEHBP-participating plans from rejecting eligible workers and retirees because of preexisting medical conditions, age, sex, general health or lifestyle. As Francis says, "You may switch plans to gain the best coverage for your condition, and use the new plan without penalty."
- If you are nearing the lifetime limit of payment in your current health plan, you can switch to any of more than a dozen national fee-for-service plans, or to HMOs in your area.
- Benefits are not reduced and premiums do not increase once a participant in the FEHBP retires or hits a certain age.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
Moustafa Ismail, dubbed the Egyptian Popeye for his 31-inch biceps, eats seven pounds of protein, nine pounds of of carbohydrates and three gallons of water to maintain the world's biggest arms, according to the Guinness Book of World Records. Sadly, he's not a fan of spinach.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Are you in CSRS and your spouse or significant other is in FERS? If so, Federal News Radio wants to talk to you! Email Executive Editor Jason Miller for more information.
OPM's new closure policies aim to clear up confusion
The Office of Personnel Management wants to ensure the confusion over the status of federal offices during Hurricane Sandy is not repeated for future natural or man-made events.
House GOP recommends new committee chairmen
Top House Republicans announced their recommendations Tuesday for the new Congress' committee chairmanships, with Paul Ryan returning to the Budget panel.
Feds with families hardest hit by proposed changes to workers' comp
Disabled federal workers with dependents would be among the hardest hit by proposed changes to federal workers' compensation benefits, according to an analysis by the Government Accountability Office.