Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
The naked civil servant
Thursday - 5/17/2012, 2:00am EDT
Still, $22 million is a lot of money for one guy. It is more than the combined payroll of some federal agencies. More — come to think of it — than what the entire staff of a certain scrappy news organization makes. In twenty years!
We know that some baseball players sign multiyear, multimillion dollar contracts. And that Hollywood stars and moguls can, and recently did, drop $40,000 for a political fundraiser dinner. That included dessert.
If you make a lot of money — I guess — you don't worry much how many people know it. You might need increased security, but making the big bucks is generally a good thing. The American dream.
But if you don't make a lot of money, it is easy to become defensive about your salary. Especially if it seems that some groups — politicians, portions of the press and disgruntled members of the public — don't think you are worth whatever you get. Even if they don't know how much you make. The you, of course, would be you. John Q. Federal Worker.
Thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request, it is now possible, if you know their name, to find out how much almost every federal civil servant makes in salaries and bonuses, if any. That means you can find out how much your neighbor makes. And he/she can find out what you make if you work for Uncle Sam. Is that a good thing? Are you happy about it?
Here's what one worried worker has to say about the "salary expose"
...I hope you write something very powerful and clear about how wrong it is to publish BY EMPLOYEE NAME the salaries and bonuses of federal employees. It's one thing to research federal salaries and report them in the aggregate, but for anyone in the public to be able to identify individuals and their salary/bonus data so easily with a couple of strokes on the keyboard is unfair and I think yet another strategy for federal-employee skapegoating (re. tightening federal budget) that's been the pattern over the past few years. — DonnaI ran this by a colleague. I said I thought it was an invasion of privacy. I said I thought the bonus information was fair game, but publishing salaries of individuals is just creepy.
He often (make that nearly always) disagrees with me. Including on this one. He said he thought it was fine because public employees are, well, public employees. When you sign on with Uncle Sam your life is an open book. ( I guess people at the IRS know what we all make, or say we make. I sure hope they don't go public with it.)
I'm not sure you knew that when you took the oath of office that anybody can look up your payroll information. But you know it now.
So, how do you feel about that?
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
Studies show that people are less accurate at throwing darts at pictures of babies than they are at throwing darts at Adolf Hitler, according to Life's Little Mysteries. Scientists posit it's because photographs, a relatively recent invention, throw our subconscious for a loop. Humans have a hard time differentiating between the the photo and reality.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
White House threatens veto of House defense bill
In a scathing, seven-page statement, the Office of Management and Budget listed its objections yesterday to the Defense spending blueprint put forward by the House Armed Services Committee. The House will begin debating the bill today and is expected to pass the measure on Friday. The bill's total is $8 billion more than what President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans agreed to last summer in a deficit-cutting deal.
Big Data creates big challenges for agencies
The amount of individual data bytes created is so enormous, it is fast out pacing the ability to capture, search, analyze or store it. Big Data is the general term used to describe the 2.5 quintillion bytes of data produced each day.