Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Divorce, federal style
Thursday - 4/5/2012, 2:00am EDT
There are also people who keep working because they will lose money, in some cases a lot, by retiring because they are divorced. When they retire, their ex-spouse will get a chunk of that monthly pension payment, for life. Case in point, a still-working-fed who's ex is praying for her retirement. Here's her situation:
"I'm trying to find an answer about Voluntary Contribution annuities. I am a longtime fed, divorced long ago, and my ex will eventually receive a pro-rata share of my CSRS annuity based on half of the length of our marriage — about 25 percent of the overall annuity when I eventually retire.We put the question to David Snell. He's the director of retirement services for the National Active and Retired Federal Employees. He pointed out that he's not a lawyer, and that court orders differ. But in general, he said "working longevity is the best revenge when it comes to court ordered benefits. However, once the employee retires, the wording of the divorce decree/property settlement will determine how the retiree's annuity is to be divided and paid. I'm not a paralegal however, Voluntary Contributions that the employee uses to purchase additional annuity at retirement is a separate benefit from the regular retirement annuity and is treated differently for federal income tax purposes and is not subject to Cost of Living Adjustments. So my hunch is unless the court order specifically mentions the former spouse will get a portion of the benefit derived from the voluntary contributions, the annuity purchased by them will not be subject to the court order."
"The divorce whacked my retirement plans hard, but the longer I continue to work, the larger my share of the pension grows. I'm considering starting voluntary contributions now to purchase an additional increment of annuity when I retire, to beef up MY share of my CSRS annuity. Is this possible, to designate the voluntary contributions to just one side of the split? I wouldn't want to have the voluntary annuity added to the TOTAL unreduced annuity prior to dividing it, or the ex would receive 25 percent of my voluntary contributions I made after our divorce ... not a good financial plan for me!" J.A.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
Forget GPS or Google Maps. Today, April 5, is "National Read a Road Map" day. Enjoy folding that map!
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
GSA scandal highlights IG role, but vacancies persist
Aside from the abrupt personnel changes at the General Services Administration, the spending scandal highlighted the role of the agency inspector general in federal oversight. But it turns out many agencies and departments now lack an official IG, according to data maintained by the Project on Government Oversight.
Rep. Mica: IG report is 'just the tip of the iceberg' of problems at GSA
The chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee said he will hold a hearing when Congress returns from recess on the scathing IG report and other shortcoming at GSA's Public Building Service.
Obama signs bill banning insider trading by feds, Congress
President Barack Obama signed legislation Wednesday prohibiting members of Congress, the president and thousands of other federal workers from engaging in insider trading. The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge - or STOCK - Act emphasizes that lawmakers are not exempt from laws against insider trading.