Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
The thumb of all fears
Monday - 1/30/2012, 2:00am EST
Many cost-cutting (at your expense) plans were floated last year — by Presidential panels and blue ribbon groups, as part of a House budget plan and, finally, the congressional supercommittee that, in the end, failed to launch. Feds sweated all year. But it looks like crunch time is coming on or about Feb. 29. Feds, and retirees, have a lot at stake. But first, this brief setup:
When they were little kids, my two sons and two daughters, had a favorite multiple-choice project to pass the time. And it amused them. At my expense.
When driving to the beach, or somewhere, they would play what I called the "horrible-options-game." That is, they gave me a series of "choices", and tell me I had to pick one. As I recall there were often five horrible or disgusting options. One for each kid, plus a wild card: For example, would I rather:
- Be tossed in a tank with a 20-foot Nile River crocodile
- Slide down a razor-sharp bannister into a vat of alcohol
- Walk a tight-rope over Niagara Falls, blindfolded
- Be dropped in a nest of baby pterodactyls who haven't eaten in a week.
- Run barefoot around the rim of Mt. Vesuvius when it was erupting
When I said none of the above, they said I had to make a pick, please, or it would ruin their childhood. That it was only a game. "Pick one, please!"
I always caved, picking one finger of the horrid hand they dealt me.
I knew I would be wrong. And I was always right.
Whatever choice I made, they would howl in mock disgust. "Gross, disgusting" — how could I pick that option?
Now, after years of therapy (theirs and mine), their children have adapted the you-can't-win game to the 21st century. Revenge can be a long time coming, but it is sweet when it happens.
With that intro, I would like to ask you to name your own poison.
A joint House-Senate committee, as you know, is looking at a variety of ways to save money , to continue the payroll tax cut and fund extended unemployment benefits. Some, but not all, of the potential savings/cuts are likely to come out of your hide.
We don't know which proposals they are considering. We probably don't know all of the possible proposals. And we don't know which, if any, they will recommend to the full Congress. But we know some of them, so here's the deal. Here's a list of what may be on the joint committee's shopping list. Given the choices, assuming at least one of them will be made, which would you pick? Think of it as if you were dealt a five-finger hand, and you must pick the least horrible (to you) option. Will it be:
- An extension of the current two-year pay freeze by another year, or two or even three more years.
- Basing future retirement benefits on your highest five-year average salary.
- Adopting a revised formula that would reduce (by an estimated 0.4 percent each year) future cost-of-living adjustments for retirees.
Eliminate the cash supplement for FERS employees who voluntarily retire before age 62.
- Set up a voucher system to purchase health insurance, or phase in a program that would require feds and retirees to pay a much larger share of their health premiums.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
It's an old expression that no two snowflakes are alike. During a snowstorm in January 1885, Wilson Bentley became the first person to photograph a single snowflake. He captured the image under a microscope using a bellows camera, Discovery reports.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Pay raises, bases are potential victims of DoD budget cuts
The Pentagon is revealing parts of its budget plan for fiscal year 2013. The proposal includes the scaling back of several weapons systems, savings on personnel costs, along with an assurance from top DoD officials that even though the military will be smaller, it will be more agile and more capable. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is also calling for another round of base realignments and closures.
Feds need to develop a strategy to ease retirement path
The Office of Personnel Management is vowing to tackle its backlog of retirement applications. OPM received more the 15,000 new retirement applications this month, which is more than double the normal load. All told, there's a backlog of about 50,000 cases.
CTO Aneesh Chopra to step down
Aneesh Chopra, the White House's first chief technology officer, is stepping down. A White House official confirmed Chopra's last day would be Feb. 8. Neither Chopra nor the White House have indicated what Chopra's are after leaving.