Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Buyouts gaining steam — be ready
Thursday - 1/12/2012, 2:00am EST
Buyouts are a different story, however, if it's your department or your part of the agency that has a limited-time, hit-the-road-Jack offer of $25k if you are ready, willing and able to bail by a certain deadline.
Buyouts were born in the early 1990s when $15,000 to $18,000 (that's the amount most buyout-takers get after deductions) was much more rewarding. Originally they were aimed at blue-collar, male veterans in the Defense Department. They were later expanded to other agencies on a limited basis. Congress, at first, had to approve each buyout. The purpose of the Clinton-era buyouts was to eliminate nearly 300,000 federal jobs that the White House labeled "overhead."
President Clinton wanted to shrink the bureaucracy to its pre-Vietnam-era size during the Kennedy years. Buyouts were targeted to certain occupational groups and jobs that were taken over by contractors, who continued doing work for the government — but outside the federal retirement and health insurance programs.
The 21st century version of buyouts is different in almost every way except the payout itself. It is still a maximum of $25,000 before deductions ($20,000 in the U.S. Postal Service). Congress no longer has to approve each agency buyout. The new buyouts are also often more targeted — by occupation, region and sometimes even grade levels — rather than agency-wide. The Office of Personnel Management must approve them. Initially, agencies refused to comment on buyout plans until OPM had approved them. Now — like the General Services Administration — they are so confident of approval, they announce their request before getting an official OK.
"Preempting your request isn't as reckless or confident as it seems," said a former agency HR director. "In the old days, we were afraid you guys (in the media) would publicize a request and p--- off Congress. Today the buyout machinery is much smoother ... People accept it as a good deal for the government and the need for buyouts is much more serious."
He said agencies back then "were driven by large degree by the President's desire to bring down the size of government to JFK-era levels. Today, agencies — and GSA, and Air Force are prime examples — are trying to meet current and anticipated budget levels and to avoid furloughs or layoffs. "
Federal News Radio has been swamped by requests from IRS workers asking if their giant agency, one of Uncle Sam's few profit centers, is going to offer buyouts. And if so, which groups will be targeted? We've also heard from people in Interior, Justice and Army who say they are standing by. For an updated 2012 buyout guide to agencies, click here.
If you are hoping for a buyout, there are a number of things to consider. Not least is how much money you have set aside to pay bills while living on a reduced, interim annuity payment. For more on that, click here.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
Forget about comparing apples and oranges. How about comparing an actual apple (the fruit) and an Apple iPhone. Some fun statistics for you, courtesy of Jerry James Stone's blog on Discovery.com.
- The average apple weighs about the same as an iPhone 4S
- Apples make up 17 percent of the total fruit eaten by Americans, while Apple iPhones make up 28 percent of the total smartphones purchased by Americans
- China produces 44 percent of the world's apples and 100 percent of the world's Apple iPhones
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Pitfalls ahead for potential OMB successor?
The search for a new director at the Office of Management and Budget comes as the agency prepares to release the President's 2013 budget request. Who will take the helm as the intense budget season gets underway?
Congressman Cummings: Fight ahead for federal pay raise
The ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee expects strong opposition to the President's proposed 0.5 percent pay raise for feds.
Privacy group sues DHS, NSA over FOIA requests
The Electronic Privacy Information Center is suing the Homeland Security Department and the National Security Agency. In both cases, EPIC is unhappy with how the government responded to its Freedom of Information Act requests.
Buyouts possible after USDA office closures
The Agriculture Department's closing of 259 offices could result in buyout offers, said the agency's deputy secretary. This week Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the closures would save about $150 million in the agency's $145 billion budget.