Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Feds in a tight spot - literally
Thursday - 7/7/2011, 2:01am EDT
The White House has launched a campaign to fight childhood obesity. Diet books continue to be best sellers. Doctor and health shows, and infomercials tell us how to slim down, and the NBC show, The Biggest Loser, is one of network TV's biggest winners.
Some airlines now charge some people double fares although the in-flight movies typically show films starring half-starved, pill-popping women who are supposed to be just like us.
So, could it be that federal workers are actually getting smaller? Are tighter-fitting offices, cubicles, or work spaces the wave of the future?
At least one inquiring fed thinks the answer to the above is "yes." She's part of the great BRAC upheaval to what, she says, will be a brave new (and much smaller) world.
"I have a question: Are you aware of a regulation that mandates the amount of workspace that DoD employees (or federal employees) should have? I ask because my office is moving about 100 people from a cubicle farm to a new building where we are each being provided a workspace that consists of a 2' x 5' table, without divider walls, per person.To reach me, email@example.com
"I've looked online and have found cases concerning AFGE employees that indicate that minimum should be 60 (or 64) square [feet] per employee, but my office is not a union office (mostly military with a handful of contractors and Department of the Army/GS civilians in grades 12-14).
"Here is additional oddness: There is an Army Regulation (AR1-21, dated 5/8/1985) that deals with space requirements (both office size and 'open space') in the National Capital region. It is quite clear and lays things out by grade and duties. However, after I showed it to my division leadership, the response I got was 'Yup. The higher leadership says they cannot accommodate the regulation due to BRAC.' Can it be that 'BRAC stuff' invalidates/negates regulations?
"Could it be time for me to pay an elected official a friendly visit?" J with the Army
Nearly Useless Factoid:
According to WhiteHouse.gov, the "S" in Harry S. Truman doesn't stand for anything. "The President was named after both of his grandfathers, Anderson Shippe Truman and Solomon Young. The initial honors them both."
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO:
Retaliation is feds' most common EEOC complaint
In FY 2010, the EEOC received 17,583 complaints against the federal government - up nearly 4 percent from the previous year.
Unions urge Congress to reject pension contribution hike
A coalition of unions and federal groups are protesting a proposal that would increase federal employees' retirement contributions from 0.8 percent to about 6 percent as part of a deficit reduction compromise.
DoD decides not to move DISA to Cyber Command
The Defense Information Systems Agency is staying put and not moving to the Defense Department's Cyber Command. But the Networks Integration and Information office still is going away.