Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
The good old days for feds - both of them!
Thursday - 4/14/2011, 5:46pm EDT
To protect your sanity and recall happier times, remember how good (relatively speaking) you felt last weekend. Knowing among other things that you had a job to go to on Monday. Or that you could take a paid vacation.
After months of political threats to pay, pensions, benefits and job security, and after weeks of being the butt of late night TV hosts, you could relax. For, as it turns out, maybe two days.
Better than nothing. But not much better.
Feds emerged from the tentative budget deal (scheduled for a vote today) with their within-grade pay raises intact. The original plan had been to scuttle those three percent, semi-automatic adjustments that would go to workers every one, two or three years despite the on-going two-year pay freeze.
Instead, Congress has tenatively opted for an overall cut of 0.2 percent in across the board spending. Defense, which is in line for more money, would be exempt from the cuts.
But on our Your Turn radio show yesterday, Federal Times editor Steve Watkins said that within-grade raises - worth $1.5 billion per year to employees - will still be on a congressional hit list. To listen to that show, click here.
The President proposed the two-year pay freeze. His deficit reduction commission recommended a three-year freeze and some House Republicans want to make it a mini-ice age that would last five years. Given the political mood, feds might be "lucky" to have to endure a pay freeze lasting only three years.
On the table are serious proposals to cut federal employment by 200,000 (about 1 in every 10 non-postal jobs) and to limit cost of living adjustments to federal and postal retirees who are age 62 and older.
Under the old Civil Service Retirement System, which covers most current retirees, COLAs are paid at any age, even if the individual retired as early as his or her mid-40s. Workers under the FERS retirement system, which covers most people still on the job, get reduced. Their "diet COLAs" don't start until they are 62.
Federal/military/social security retirees haven't received COLAs for two years. But the rising price of gasoline and food makes it likely they will be getting an inflation adjustment next January. Unless Congress blocks it (unlikely) or changes the formula to produce what it says are more realistic (read "smaller") COLAs in the future.
With White House cooperation, at least some of the cuts proposed by the president's deficit reduction commission are likely to sail through Congress.
Meantime, cherish the good old days. They seem like only yesterday, when in fact they were actually four days ago!
Yesterday's column proposed color-coded arm bands for federal workers. The bands would come in handy next time Congress considers a government shutdown. When faced with a shutdown last week the White House said 800,000 non-postal workers would be furloughed. But many workers were not aware whether they would be working or sent home. The arm bands would identify those who would work because their jobs are considered essential, those who would not work because they are not considered essential and, the third category, those who would work even though their jobs are not considered essential.
In addition to 800,000 furloughed feds, an even greater number of government contractors would be impacted by any shutdown. And unlike the feds, who might eventually get paid for not working, the contractors would have to eat the furlough.
To that end Stan G. of Gaithersburg says that he and his fellow government contractors also deserve arm-bands that would show their status during a furlough. He suggested the colors for contractors would be GOLD (since they are rolling in money!!!), PLUM for those who are funded by prior-year appropriations, and PINK for those that will get paid anyway!!!
Nearly Useless Factoid
By Julia Ziegler
Danny DeVito was once a hairdresser and Harrison Ford worked as a carpenter before making it big. Check out Zimbio.com for more of your favorite celebrities pre-Hollywood gigs.
ALSO ON FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Issa: Pay debate is subset of larger challenges
The Chairman of House Oversight and Government Reform Committee said Republicans can sound evil during the debate about whether feds are overpaid. But the bigger issue, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said, is the overall HR processes used across government.
Deficit plan to target fed pay, benefits?
The President's speech Wednesday did not address how federal employees' pay and benefits would be impacted, but his deficit reduction commission's recommendation's last year proposed cuts to federal pay and benefits.
Oversight committee passes bills targeting tax delinquent feds, contractors
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform passed two bills on Wednesday that prohibit a person with "seriously delinquent tax debt" from being a federal employee or contractor.