Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Lame Ducks & Your Pay Raise
Monday - 8/16/2010, 4:00am EDT
Maybe plenty, but first what's a lame duck?
For purposes of this discussion, a lame duck is a member of the House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate who either didn't get reelected, or didn't run for another term. But who continues to vote for awhile.
Congressional lame ducks are usually rare birds. In many, if not most, congressional elections the incumbent gets reelected. Lame-duckery is usually self-inflicted rather than voter-driven. As a result most lame duck sessions of Congress are, well, lame. Not much happens. But the election of 2010 could be different.
Congressional districts have been carved up, as in gerrymandered, by both political parties to ensure that in some places the winner is nearly always going to be a Democrat or Republican. No matter who is running and what the issues are.
But if the pollsters and pundits are correct (and sometimes they are) the upcoming November election is going to be tough for incumbents in general and Democratic incumbents in particular. If that happens, if lots of incumbents lose, post-election Washington will be crawling with sore-tailed lame ducks and congressional staffers who will be seeking other jobs.
Although rejected by the voters, the lame ducks will not be dead (as in non-voting) legislators until the end of the year. In other words, Congress will have time to pass, or reject, proposals with a potentially large number of lame ducks voting.
In a situation like this, the first mid-term test for a new administration, anything can happen. And with tough economic times, people who have lost jobs, homes or half the value of their 401(k) plans are not happy. They are looking for a fix and, in many cases, would like the government to feel a little of their pain.
Federal-military-Social Security retirees did not get a cost of living adjustment in 2010, and they will not get one in 2011 either.
Many people in the private sector who still have jobs are making 5 to 25 percent less than they did before they were forced (or in some cases voted) to take pay cuts rather than lose their jobs.
While all this is going on the federal government is growing. It is expanding to handle new programs and power over various major segments of the economy: Banks and health care among them.
The administration also intends to reverse and correct policies begun in the Clinton administration (and continued with vigor under President Bush) to outsource federal jobs. This administration is seeking out jobs that are "inherently governmental" which are being performed by private contractors or sub-contractors. Those jobs, once identified, are to be returned to the federal fold.
So what about the 2011 federal pay raise?
Bill Bransford and Jessica Klement, two people who ought to know, say the proposed 1.4 percent white collar federal pay raise (or any pay raise) is not a sure thing. He's general counsel of the Senior Executives Association. She's top lobbyist for the Federal Managers Association. Last week the three of us hosted a legislative update session at the FDR Conference in Atlanta. One of the questions was about the pay raise the President has proposed for January.
Both agreed that the pay raise could be an issue when Congress returns the second week in September, or when the lame duck Congress returns after the elections. Klement noted that three earlier attempts to freeze pay failed in Congress either by a narrow margin, or for procedural reasons.
So the pay raise is still on schedule. But anything could happen this year. Stay tuned...
Nearly Useless Factoid
by Suzanne Kubota
Kool-Aid was invented in 1927 by Edwin Perkins. He later married his childhood sweetheart, Kitty Shoemaker, who had developed her own famous product: Jell-O.
ADDITIONAL PAY AND BENEFITS NEWS ON FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
How money really can buy you happiness
People work for a lot of reasons. Fulfillment. Pride. Feeding and sheltering themselves and their families. Most federal workers have a little money left over after the basics are met. They buy things. And things often beget more things. So the question comes up, can money equate with happiness? Arthur Stein, a certified financial planner with SPC Financial, says there is evidence that money can actually buy some happiness. The trick is to spend it the right way. Read more here.
ALSO ON FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Labor hires more to monitor pay equity
The Department of Labor is stepping up its efforts to monitor pay equity and wage discrimination. As part of a new, collaborative effort among the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, the Department of Justice and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the administration will ensure strategic enforcement of pay discrimination cases. Pat Shiu, is head of the Contract Compliance Office and tells us more. Read more here.