Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Pay, Pensions Facing Firing Squad?
Wednesday - 7/7/2010, 4:00am EDT
In reality, Congress and the White House sometimes do the same thing. Especially when the goal is to reduce federal spending/pork without angering special interest groups with something to lose.
The congressional version of the substituting a blank for a bullet often comes in the form of a special blue-ribbon, bipartisan commission. It is set up to study the problem and recommend hard choices that go into effect unless politicians veto the entire package. Like the base-closing BRAC which allowed many members of Congress to act innocent when local bases were shut down and jobs lost, or transferred elsewhere.
Much the same sort of thing is happening now, only on a potentially grander scale. The White House has set up a National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. It will look at virtually all federal spending programs and recommend cuts in some/many/most of them - including federal pay raises and retirement benefits. Deadline for the all-or-nothing recommendations is December.
Groups representing active and retired federal and postal workers are well aware that anytime anyone contemplates ways to cut or reduce federal spending that civil service retirement benefits are always on the menu. Especially the full-COLA inflation catch-up that goes to the majority of current retirees who are under the old CSRS program.
In the past there have been suggestions and even feeble (in retrospect) efforts to reduce government annuities. The to-do list either proposes freezing benefits for a specific time period, or eliminating in part the full inflation-catch-up enjoyed by CSRS, until last year when the government said their was no inflation to catch up to.
Because of deflation, retirees didn't get a COLA this year and probably won't get one next January. But there is a good chance the commission will seriously consider a return-to-inflation plan that would put all federal retirees on diet-COLAs. That is an annual increase that is one or two percentage points less than the actual rate of inflation. Or delay the COLA payments until retirees hit age 62, as is the case now with the FERS retirement plan.
It's too soon to panic. And there may not be any cause to panic in the future. But keep your eye on the Commission and, if you belong to a union or association representing feds, postals, managers, executive or retirees, follow what they are doing to protect the pension package.
For more on the potential threat to your retirement benefits, listen to our Your Turn with Mike Causey radio show today (10am EDT). Our first guest will be Dan Adcock, legislative director of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees. At 10:30 a.m. benefits strategist John Elliott will bring you up to speed on how to make the most of your federal benefits package.
To reach me: firstname.lastname@example.org
Nearly Useless Factoid
by Suzanne Kubota
In June of 1939, says MentalFloss, King George VI became the first reigning British monarch to visit the United States. On the menu at a picnic at the Roosevelt's home in Hyde Park: hot dogs.
ADDITIONAL PAY AND BENEFITS NEWS ON FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
How safe are your federal benefits?
There has been a lot of discussion surrounding federal pay and benefits both here and abroad. The BBC is reporting the UK has not only put a freeze on benefits but they are also cutting back on pensions. So, what is the U.S. facing? Are we in better shape -- or are we worse off? Hear Mike Causey talk with the DorobekInsider about this. Read more here.
ALSO ON FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Mindsets must change if OMB's IT reforms are to work
The Office of Management and Budget wants to reform government IT and cut down on waste. They recently launched an initiative aimed at cutting down on waste by reforming IT. But are they going about it the right way? OMB Director Peter Orszag said in that recent blog post that the government is way behind the private sector in terms of IT modernization. But is comparing the public and private sectors even fair? Bill Eggers is the Global Research Director for Deloitte's public sector and brings us analysis. Read more here.