Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Federal employee pay has been a target in cost-cutting efforts by the President and Congress, aided by a public perception of feds as overpaid "fat cats." Claims about public vs. private pay have swung widely - from the Federal Salary Council's data that shows feds are paid 24 percent less than the private sector, to a Cato Institute report that says feds are paid double the private sector. What's the reality? Federal News Radio brings you interviews and analysis on the federal pay debate.
In the federal pay debate, 1 + 1 doesn't always equal 2
Thursday - 6/14/2012, 5:24am EDT
But some experts believe the source of angst — and disagreement — can be found in the different methodologies researchers use to formulate their conclusions.
On one hand, analysts at the Federal Salary Council based their conclusion that federal employees earned 26 percent less on average on a straight job-to-job comparison, which examines public and private sector salaries for similar positions.
That evaluation system "tends to be the model that all private sector jobs are classified under as well," said council member Rex Facer Wednesday at a Coalition for Effective Change panel discussion in Washington.
The job-to-job method is useful for determining whether agencies are giving federal employees "appropriate" salaries.
On the other hand, experts argue the council's method is too narrowly focused, instead preferring the "human capital approach," which factors in additional criteria, such as education and work experience.
"Economists tend to use the human capital model, [which has] had the best predictive power in terms of wages," said Andrew Biggs, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and co-author of a June 2011 federal and private sector pay comparison that used this approach. The study concluded federal workers earned 14 percent more salary than similar private sector employees.
A Congressional Budget Office study released Jan. 30 also incorporated the human capital approach, finding that overall, federal employees earned about 2 percent more in wages compared with similar workers in the private sector. When researchers factored in total compensation, including benefits, the number jumped to 16 percent.