Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Federal employee pay has been a target in cost-cutting efforts by the President and Congress, aided by a public perception of feds as overpaid "fat cats." Claims about public vs. private pay have swung widely - from the Federal Salary Council's data that shows feds are paid 24 percent less than the private sector, to a Cato Institute report that says feds are paid double the private sector. What's the reality? Federal News Radio brings you interviews and analysis on the federal pay debate.
Crowdsourcing meets the federal pay debate
Thursday - 3/24/2011, 10:31am EDT
Senior Internet Editor
Changing the federal pay system, or civil service in general, would involve a lot of moving parts, and even more stakeholders.
Rep. Dennis Ross, (R-Fla) told Federal News Radio he intends to hear from all of them.
As chair of the the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, U.S. Postal Service and Labor Policy, Ross heard recently from many, but missing on the hearing's witness list were feds.
Ross said he's learned there's a particularly low attrition rate for federal workers, and their benefits are generally better than the private sector. He told the Federal Drive what he's looking for now is ideas from federal employees about how the government can operate within it financial means. "Who better can do that." asked Ross, "than those that are out there actually performing the service, so we need their feedback. We want them to be engaged in this process."
While he said he's interested in finding efficiencies anywhere, he's particularly keen to hear about the workforce from the workforce.
Those in the federal workforce have got a good position, have got good benefits, but then again, those that are performing well are rewarded no greater than those that are performing poorly, and that to me is something that needs to be addressed. That those that are performing well need to be rewarded based on performance; that those that are performing poorly need to be dealt with differently, and I think that's where you start creating a greater efficiency, effectiveness, and I think a greater morale within the federal workforce.
So the next step in the process, he said, is to set up a website "where federal employees can anonymously provide suggestions, criticisms, ideas of how to make their particular job, or any particular federal workforce job, better, more efficient, more cost-effective."
Ross said the site should be up and running within the next 30 days.
Once comments start coming in, said Ross, "I think what we're going to find is that a lot of people are going to be painfully honest with their performance and how well they've been doing and how well somebody else has not been doing and how we can correct that."
Once the suggestions have been submitted, Ross said the subcommittee will "want to be able to take these and implement them into some form of legislation that allows us to reform the workforce procedures. Again, this may be so far as to reform the General Schedule."
OTHER PAY DEBATE STORIES