Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
Federal employee pay has been a target in cost-cutting efforts by the President and Congress, aided by a public perception of feds as overpaid "fat cats." Claims about public vs. private pay have swung widely - from the Federal Salary Council's data that shows feds are paid 24 percent less than the private sector, to a Cato Institute report that says feds are paid double the private sector. What's the reality? Federal News Radio brings you interviews and analysis on the federal pay debate.
Analysis: Federal workforce size doesn't matter
Tuesday - 2/22/2011, 10:41am EST
Senior Internet Editor
The budget battle on Capitol Hill is resurrecting questions about the size of the federal workforce.
House Speaker John Boehner has raised eyebrows by saying the administration has added 200,000 new jobs. That number is in dispute, though, and others have come up with their own tallies.
John Palguta stresses the workforce size is not as important as what you do with it.
Vice president for Policy at the Partnership for Public Service, Palguta has been tracking the number of federal jobs.
Palguta cautioned there are a couple of ways to count any workforce, "which is part of the confusion."
He told the Federal Drive, "there's the full time equivalent," which is to add up all the hours paid for then divide by 2,080, the number of hours in a work year. That answer is the "full time equivalent count."
"But then then there's the actual head count," which he explained should include both how many hired and how many have left.
"If you take a look at the number of hires, people will fixate on that and not look at the logical question of how many people left." In 2010, said Palguta, 142,000 people were hired into fulltime permanent positions and 91,000 left, "so there was a net of about 60,000, and most of those folks went into Defense, Homeland Security, VA and Justice."
According to Palguta's calculations, the total federal workforce currently is at "about 2.1 million full time equivalent, and that is ironically the same number that we had 35 years ago in 1967."
And even that total number doesn't really tell the whole story.
"Twenty years ago, in 1989," said Palguta, "we had one federal employee for every 110 resident in the United States. Twenty years later, we had one federal employee for every 147." The size of the workforce remained "remarkably consistent" and "yet the demands upon government obviously have increased dramatically."
The bottom line, said Palguta, "is two things. One, the federal government has not been a growth industry, and the second thing, it's not the number of workers we should be focusing on. When we're talking about the size of government, I don't think it's really the size of the workforce, it's really what we're having government doing."
Once we decide upon what the federal government should be doing, then, said Palguta, you have to figure out what we need to do it well.