Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Federal employee pay has been a target in cost-cutting efforts by the President and Congress, aided by a public perception of feds as overpaid "fat cats." Claims about public vs. private pay have swung widely - from the Federal Salary Council's data that shows feds are paid 24 percent less than the private sector, to a Cato Institute report that says feds are paid double the private sector. What's the reality? Federal News Radio brings you interviews and analysis on the federal pay debate.
Promotion freeze proposed for all federal workers
Thursday - 2/17/2011, 8:26am EST
Senior Internet Editor
Your pay's already frozen for two years. Your step increase, your bonus or your promotion might be next.
Two amendments have been proposed that would deny federal employees step increases currently allowed under the General Schedule.
Rep. Todd Rokita (R-IN.) has introduced an amendment (Amendment #210 to H.R. 1) to the continuing resolution the House is working on that bars the use of federal funds for paying federal employees "any increase in the rate of salary or basic pay" for any office or position with the federal government.
Rep. Darrell Issa, (R-CA.) Wednesday introduced a separate amendment (Amendment #569 to H.R. 1) that would bar the use of step increases, which are small increases eligible to federal employees based on the successful performance of their work.
In a letter sent to the House of Representatives, Federal Managers Association president Patricia Niehaus said "By supporting these amendments, I fear Members of Congress are bowing to political pressure stemming from the spread of misinformation relating to both the composition of the federal workforce and the impact instituting a freeze will have on deficit reduction efforts."
GovExec reports "Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, called the amendments onerous and poorly-drafted. The proposals single out federal employees and would have a negative effect on government's recruitment and retention efforts, as well as agency missions, she said. The proposals come on the heels of legislation aimed at freezing federal hiring."
Federal Times estimates that roughly 1.1 million GS employees would still receive more than $2.5 billion in step increase raises in 2011 and 2012.
The amendments are among nearly 600 being proposed for addition to HR 1, the omnibus spending bill that would fund the government for the remainder of fiscal 2011. Current funding expires March 4th.
Attrition and Discretionary Spending
Two other bills directly affecting federal employee pay and benefits have also been introduced in Congress.
Rep. Cynthia Lummis, (R-WY), re-introduced the Federal Workforce Reduction Act, limiting hiring governmentwide to one hire for every two employees who leave federal service, except at the Defense, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs departments.
On the Senate side, Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), has re-introduced S. 360, the Honest Expenditures Limitation Program (HELP) Act of 2011 which would freeze non-security discretionary spending to 2008 levels for five years.
Does a promotion freeze make sense? Take the poll!
(Copyright 2011 by FederalNewsRadio.com. All Rights Reserved.)