Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
House OKs federal pension hike as part of fiscal-cliff alternative
Thursday - 12/20/2012, 7:12pm EST
The 2012 Spending Reduction Act, introduced by House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), is nearly identical to a measure passed by the House last spring that sought to nullify the automatic sequestration cuts by replacing them with alternative savings.
Federal workers under the Federal Employees Retirement System now pay 0.8 percent of their salaries toward their pensions while the government kicks in 11.7 percent. Under the proposed bill, by 2017 federal workers under FERS would be required to contribute 5.8 percent. The bill would also eliminate a supplementary payment for feds who retire before they're eligible for Social Security, however, that would only apply to new hires.
House Republican leaders are pairing the spending-cut bill with their "Plan B" tax-cut bill. Votes on both bills are expected Thursday evening.
The bill also contains a provision allowing federal employees to invest unused annual leave and vacation into their Thrift Savings Plan accounts.
Federal-employee unions have denounced the pension hikes.
"Make no mistake, an increased contribution toward one's pension, with no corresponding increase in benefits, is a pay cut," Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, wrote in a letter to lawmakers.
The bill is likely dead-on-arrival in the Senate. After the House passed the first version of the bill earlier this year, Senate Democratic leaders never brought it up for a vote.