Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
CBO: Congress could wring $300B in deficit savings from federal pay, pension changes
Friday - 11/15/2013, 12:30pm EST
Federal employees have already sacrificed some $100 billion in deficit reduction through a three-year pay freeze, federal unions and advocacy groups contend. But Congress could wring more than $300 billion in savings from federal pay and benefits, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis released this week.
CBO presented its analysis to the House-Senate budget conference committee at the panel's second public meeting Wednesday. The committee is negotiating over ways to replace the automatic sequestration budget cuts and to come up with funding levels for the remainder of fiscal 2014.
CBO's analysis contained half a dozen proposals — out of more than 100 — affecting federal employees, including reducing annual pay raises, requiring federal employees to contribute more toward their pensions and reducing the size of the federal workforce through attrition.
All told, such proposals would reduce federal outlays or increase revenues by $308 billion, according to CBO estimates.
However, CBO noted several times in its report that trimming federal compensation risks making federal service less attractive and could potentially drive away new recruits to the federal workforce.
Increasing feds' retirement contributions
Total: $308 billion
CBO's analysis examined a number of changes lawmakers could make to federal employees' pensions.
Currently, employees under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) — hired before Dec. 31, 2012 — contribute 0.8 percent of their salaries toward their pensions. Employees hired starting in 2013 are required to contribute 3.1 percent of their salaries toward their pensions because of a bill to extend the payroll tax cut passed in February 2012.
Requiring federal employees hired before 2013 to contribute an additional 1.2 percent of their salaries toward their pensions — for a total of 2.9 percent — would increase federal revenues by $19 billion over 10 years, CBO stated. That's identical to a plan pushed by President Barack Obama in his 2014 budget proposal
Because the proposal would not have any additional effect on new federal hires, it likely wouldn't affect the quality of new federal recruits, CBO said.
However, it could motivate current employees to leave for the private sector or retire earlier, because "it would reduce the income of federal employees who have already foregone across-the-board pay increases for three consecutive years," the analysis stated. "Federal employees who have not received salary increases based on merit or length of service have seen the purchasing power of their pay fall by about 7 percent since 2010."
Moving from high-three to high-five
Additionally, changing the formula under which federal employees' annuities are calculated — moving from the highest three-year average salary to the highest five-year average salary — for employees who retire beginning in January 2015 would reduce total federal annuities by about 3 percent and save the government $6 billion between 2015 and 2023, according to CBO's estimates.
If implemented in 2015, it would would affect 67,000 FERS retires and 28,000 CSRS retirees.
CBO said doing so would better align federal pensions with private-sector ones. Also, many private-sector companies have nixed retiree health-insurance benefits and scaled back pensions, while the government, by and large, has not.
"As a result, federal employees receive a much larger portion of their compensation in retirement benefits than private-sector workers do, on average," CBO stated. "Consequently, reducing pensions might be less harmful to the federal government's ability to compete with the private sector in attracting and retaining highly qualified personnel than a reduction in current compensation would be."
However, CBO did note that cutting retirement benefits would make the overall compensation provided by the government less attractive, "which would discourage some people from entering federal service and hamper the ability of the government to retain its current workforce."
Switching to Chained CPI
CBO also analyzed the effect of switching to using a different measure of inflation — the chained Consumer Price Index — to calculate cost-of- living adjustments for Social Security, military and federal retirees.
Over the past decade, the so-called chained CPI has grown an average of about 0.25 percent more slowly than traditional CPI. If implemented in 2015, overall federal outlays would be reduced by $162 billion through 2023, according to CBO's estimates.