Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Pentagon says shutdown wasted at least $600 million
Friday - 10/18/2013, 4:18am EDT
Tallying the total costs of the government shutdown is not a simple task, but in the Defense Department, officials say at least $600 million went to waste.
The dollar figure is a very conservative estimate, but the easiest one to calculate, Defense officials said Thursday. It only reflects the lost productivity in the department as a result of civilian furloughs, even accounting for the fact that during most of the shutdown, the vast majority of that workforce was back on the job.
The shutdown forced DoD to waste funds in myriad other ways, said Robert Hale, DoD's comptroller, though some of them are more difficult to calculate.
"There were a number of other costs," he said. "We built up interest payments because we were forced to pay vendors late. We had to fly people back from canceled training classes and then send them right back again."
DoD officials say they also can't assign a dollar value on the punishing effects of the shutdown to employee morale, recruiting and retention. And those effects, Hale said, are cumulative.
"It's not just this event," he said. "They've had three years of pay freezes, we had the sequester furloughs, and now the shutdown furloughs. The folks out in the field are saying, 'I'm not so sure I want to continue to work for this government.' We need to keep telling them they're important, and then we need to show it through pay raises and no more furloughs."
Hale's concern about a lack of interest in working for the government was borne out in a survey conducted during the shutdown by the National Treasury Employees Union. 67 percent of federal employees surveyed said they would not recommend a civil service career to their own friends and family.
Concerns about a wave of departures
Colleen Kelley, the union's president, said the organization will watch for signs of unusually high rates of civil service departures in the coming weeks and months.
"My fear is that we'll see a lot of employees who are eligible to retire exercising that right because they don't want to face another shutdown," she said during a press briefing Thursday in Washington. "Then, with the funding levels under the continuing resolution and sequestration, most agencies are not going to backfill those positions. That's why the IRS is where they are today. They have 10,000 fewer employees than they did two years ago, and that's all been just from attrition."
Kelley said just like in the Pentagon, examples of shutdown-induced waste are abundant in civilian agencies. And unlike in DoD, most employees of those agencies were on furlough for the entire shutdown period.
"If you look at the time preparing for a shutdown, the 16 days of the shutdown, and now the time spent getting everything ramped back up, it's an immense waste of time for the American people and for federal employees," she said. "In the mid- 1990s, the Clinton administration estimated the country lost over $400 million just because the IRS enforcement divisions were not doing their work. And that was a four-day shutdown."
Federal unions say they're glad that Congress agreed to provide back pay for employees who were furloughed during the shutdown, but they're worried about the idea that that compensation won't arrive until their next regularly scheduled paycheck.
Back pay to feds sooner than later?
Agency pay periods vary, but for some workers, the next check is not due for nearly two more weeks. Unions have been urging agencies to issue special accelerated paychecks to cover the shutdown period.
Agencies generally have been receptive to the idea, Kelley said, but none of the agencies in which NTEU workers are represented had yet committed to speed up payments by midday Thursday.
J. David Cox, the president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said only one AFGE-covered agency so far has said it will do so — the Social Security Administration.
"We're trying to work with all the agencies, but clearly employees were victimized here. They need their paychecks," he said during a third press briefing of the day about the shutdown. "Many of them will have waited at least a week, but some of them are going to be almost four weeks behind in receiving their pay."
Back at the Defense Department, officials were quick to point out that while Congress managed to reopen the government, it did not provide agencies with what they've been begging for over the course of a couple years now — some level of certainty over their budgets that lasts for more than a few months at a time.