Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Feds work a month less per year than private sector, Heritage report finds
Thursday - 9/13/2012, 10:30am EDT
The report found federal employees work on average of 38.7 hours a week, compared with 41.4 hours per week in the private sector. That difference adds up to 3.8 fewer weeks per year that feds work compared with private sector workers.
"From a budgetary perspective, shorter work hours in the public sector may cause governments to be less efficient in converting tax dollars into public services. More broadly, the perception that government employees do not work as hard as private-sector employees runs counter to the spirit of public service," according to the report.
Heritage found state and local government employees work even fewer hours — 38.1 hours per week or 4.7 weeks less per year than private sector workers.
Heritage used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' American Time Use Survey to reach its findings. Heritage notes the survey only measures work time and not work effort or work effectiveness.
One federal union called Heritage's findings "utterly misleading."
"Private sector averages are low because so many private, non-union employers provide absolutely no paid time off. No sick leave, no vacation, no holidays. That is the disgrace, not the fact that public sector employers recognize that all workers need some paid time off," said Jacqueline Simon, public policy director for the American Federation of Government Employees, in an emailed statement.
The National Treasury Employees Union said the report fails to ensure comparisons are made between similar employees.
"The report's broad conclusions are meaningless absent a direct comparison of employees doing similar work," said NTEU president Colleen Kelley in an emailed statement.
Another flaw with the report is the sampling of 1,776 feds surveyed is not representative of the entire federal workforce, said the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association.
"It's unlikely the researchers reviewed the timesheets of the federal team that landed the Curiosity Rover on Mars, prepared the United States for Hurricane Irene, and are currently responding to the crises in Syria and Egypt. As America's federal employees devote their lives to our country, it is insulting to belittle their contributions with reports that disparage their work ethic," said Julie Tagen, NARFE's legislative director, in an emailed statement.
The Heritage report adds fuel to the ongoing debate over private vs. public sector compensation. A report this year by the Congressional Budget Office found feds are paid 16 percent more in total compensation than the private sector, but difference depended on educational levels. In fact, federal workers with professional or doctorate degrees earned about 23 percent less than their private sector counterparts. Meanwhile, a Bureau of Labor Statistics study last year found feds are paid 26 percent less than the private sector.
The debate comes as feds are in the middle of a two-year pay freeze that Congress is expected to extend another six months as part of a short-term spending measure. Federal benefits have been a target of budget cuts. (See a list of bills that affect federal employees' pay and benefits.)