Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Connected Government
- Consolidating Mission-critical Systems
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Eliminating the Pitfalls: Steps to Virtualization in Government
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- Government Cloud Brokerage: Who, What, When, Where, Why?
- Government Mobility
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- Mobile Device Management
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- Understanding the Intersection of Customer Service and Security in the Cloud
Shows & Panels
Light at end of tunnel: Sunshine or trainwreck?
Friday - 3/2/2012, 2:00am EST
Last month, Congress approved, and the President signed into law, a change in the FERS retirement program. People hired after Dec. 31, 2012, will be required to contribute a total of 3.1 percent of their salary each pay period to partially cover their future FERS benefit. Current FERS workers, and anyone hired through the end of the year, will continue to pay only 0.8 percent for their lifetime annuity benefit.
That minor hit represented a major victory for the handful of pro-fed politicians (mostly from the D.C. area) on Capitol Hill, and groups that represent feds, postal workers, managers and retirees. So even though they objected loudly to the future rules change, they were happy that it wasn't applied to current employees. They acknowledged privately that it could have been much worse. That was the good news. But ...
Pros who watch Congress on behalf of federal and postal workers and retirees say folks already on the payroll aren't out of the legislative woods yet. As we told you last month, the worst may be yet to come.They note that the President's budget calls for increasing retirement plan contributions for both current and future CSRS and FERS workers by 1.2 percent.There are other plans and bills pending to increase contributions much more, and some that would eliminate the civil service portion of the FERS benefit completely for future hires.
As to White House backing of a change for current workers, Federal Times senior writer Stephen Losey said that was true before the payroll tax/unemployment plan was approved but "in light of the already-enacted 3.1 percent change for future feds, it remains to be seen how any further changes might or might not affect them." He was our guest Wednesday on Federal News Radio's Your Turn radio show.
So the current contribution level for on-board feds may or may not still be in the target zone and if it is, it may not be the bullseye. At least for now.
Congress was almost completely gridlocked in 2011. That turned out to be a good thing for the federal workforce. But last month it surprised a lot of people by moving quickly on previously frozen legislation (which included the FERS contribution increase).
Losey and Jessica Klement, legislative director of the Federal Managers Association agreed that Congress probably isn't finished reshaping the federal workforce. They noted that all of the fix-the-deficit blue ribbon panels, commissions and congressional supercommittees last year took aim at the federal retirement package. The Simpson-Bowles blue-ribbon group, the first and most prestigious of the panels and appointed by President Obama, said retirement contributions need to go up for current and future employees.
The Simpson-Bowles panel was designed to operate like the BRAC panels. That is they would make recommendations that Congress would vote on — up or down with no amendments. While that didn't work, the recommendations of Simpson-Bowles serve as an unofficial template for other groups and legislators looking to decrease government costs by increasing yours.
For a look at what's pending right now, click here.
And hang in there.
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
As the House Oversight Committee investigates whether Americans are sufficiently honoring George Washington's legacy, it's important to note that George Washington did not actually grace the first $1 bill. That honor fell upon former Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase, who was tasked with designing the currency in 1862. He promptly put his image on the bill, according to Mental_Floss.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
Moran crafting bill to shake up Senior Executive Service
The federal government's top career folks would have to move out of their "comfort zones," under a bill that Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) plans to sponsor to overhaul the Senior Executive Service.
OMB builds strategy to better target grant fraud, error and waste
Danny Werfel, the controller at the Office of Management and Budget, talks to The Federal Drive with Tom Temin about how the administration wants to make grant program oversight more effective.
AFGE, SSA reach 'conceptual agreement' on new contract
A "conceptual agreement" has been reached between the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the Social Security Administration over the terms of a new national contract, AFGE announced today. The agreement came after 27 months of negotiations.