Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
'Jaws 4' coming: Guess who's bait?
Wednesday - 1/18/2012, 2:00am EST
According to some interpretations of the Mayan calendar, our days are numbered.
My dry cleaner, who is usually right about these things, says starting in December, he's only taking next-day orders. And I will have to pay in advance. Doesn't look good.
But for federal and postal workers the big bang could come a lot sooner. Like Feb. 29. That's when the payroll tax deal — along with the extension of unemployment benefits — will end, unless Congress and the White House keep them running. To do that, they would have to come up with a combination of savings and new revenue sources, which is where you come in:
House-Senate conferees are expected to approve the extensions — which all-up-for-reelection politicians favor (or better favor) if they want to keep their jobs. But continuing the reduction in the Social Security payroll tax, and extending unemployment benefits until 2013 will cost a lot.
House members of the conference committee have a solution:
- Freeze your pay for another year, and
- Increase the percentage you kick into the FERS and CSRS retirement funds each paycheck.
- Eliminate the FERS minimum supplement currently paid to employees who retire before age 62 and are eligible for Social Security.
The House has already approved the proposals. It was pretty much a party line vote with most Republicans voting for the changes and most (but not all) Democrats against them. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.) broke ranks with his party and voted against the proposals.
If approved, the changes would go into effect in 2013. For employees under the FERS program, their contributions to the retirement fund would go from 0.8 percent of salary at present to 4 percent in three years. For those under the CSRS program, contributions would go from 7 percent to 8.5 percent of salary over a three-year period.
Retirement benefits for current FERS and CSRS employees would continue to be based on the high-three formula. But for those hired after Dec. 31, 2012, annuities would be based on their highest five-year average salary.
Eliminating the FERS supplement, as proposed in the House plan, would not apply to firefighters, law enforcement personnnel, air traffic controllers and others whose jobs have a mandatory retirement age that is less than 62.
So what are the odds any or all of this will happen? After all, feds feared (rightly so) the end of their pay and benefits world several times last year. And nothing happened.
The difference, some insiders say, is that this is an election year, so something's got to give. Politico, the insiders inside journal, yesterday speculated that the payroll deal may happen fast and easily. Some insiders feel that the White House will go along with major portions of the GOP plan to preserve the payroll tax break.
Today at 10 a.m., on our Your Turn radio show, Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union will talk about the various threats facings feds and what — if anything — can be done to block or minimize them.
At 10:30 a.m.,Sean Reilly and Andy Medici from the Federal Times will also analyze the situation from another angle, and talk about the president's proposed reorganization of financially-oriented federal agencies. The show is live at 10 a.m. EST. You can listen via your computer or, in the D.C. area, by old-fashioned radio at 1500 AM. Questions or comments? E-mail me at: email@example.com
NEARLY USELESS FACTOID
By Jack Moore
In the 1975 Steven Spielberg thriller, "Jaws," three shark models, each seven yards long, brought the title character to life. The shark models were actually dubbed "Bruce" after Spielberg's lawyer.
MORE FROM FEDERAL NEWS RADIO
OPM tackles retirement backlog with more staff, better technology
The agency has sent lawmakers a detailed plan. It says the agency will ask staff to work longer hours, with rewards for increased productivity. OPM also plans to automate its retirement technology system piece by piece, since a wholesale overhaul failed a few years ago.
MIKE'S TAKE: Channeling the demon in my TV
With my TV, every evening is a surprise. I am pretty sure my flat-screen is inhabited by a higher, mischief-making power that controls my remote.
Analysis: White House reorg plan could leave out agencies' functions The White House is taking a new step toward reducing duplicative government programs and reorganizing agencies. The Office of Management and Budget has launched a pilot program to match export, trade and competitiveness programs across 11 agencies. This comes as the administration also is trying to reorganize parts of the government.