Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Does FAA backpay decision set precedent?
Thursday - 10/6/2011, 10:27am EDT
While in the past Congressional action was needed to approve backpay, Transportation Department lawyers decided — after a legislative bid for back pay failed — they didn't need separate legislation this time around to authorize make-up money.
Bill Bransford, a partner with Shaw, Bransford and Roth, joined the Federal Drive with Tom Temin and Amy Morris to discuss he legal rationale behind the decision and whether it sets a new legal precedent.
Bransford said he didn't know what led Transportation lawyers to conclude they didn't need Congress' approval to issue back pay. He cited previous incidents, along with some instances of case law supporting the need for specific authorization.
The FAA authorization that Congress eventually signed was made retroactive, leading Transportation to conclude FAA workers could be paid as if they were actually working, Bransford said.
"It's an interesting interpretation," he acknowledged. "And it's one I don't think has been made before."
As for setting a legal precedent, debates over back pay in the future will likely be "fought out on the front end," Bransford said, meaning back pay language would be included in an agency's reauthorizing legislation.
"It may complicate the resolution of future appropriations or budget battles," he explained.