Shows & Panels
- Accelerate and Streamline for Better Customer Service
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Client Virtualization Solutions
- Data Protection in a Virtual World
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Feds in the Cloud
- Health IT: A Policy Change Agent
- Improving Healthcare Outcomes through IT Policy
- IT Innovation in the New Era of Government
- Making Dollars And Sense Out of Data Center Consolidation
- Navigating the Private Cloud
- One Step to the Cloud, Two Steps Toward Innovation
- Path to FDCCI Compliance
- Take Command of Your Mobility Initiative
Shows & Panels
Feds rarely denied raise for poor performance
Wednesday - 3/23/2011, 1:50pm EDT
Federal News Radio
Only about 0.06 percent of federal employees are denied a step increase due to performance.
Based on data from the Office of Personnel Management, Federal Times found that only 737 out of more than 1.2 million General Schedule employees did not receive a regularly scheduled step increase and accompanying raise in 2009 because of poor performance.
"Most people I spoke to say it's really a sign that the government performance accountability is not cutting it and needs to be improved," said Steve Losey, senior writer at the Federal Times, in an interview with Federal News Radio's Mike Causey.
Losey added, "Withholding raises is a hollow threat."
As the lawmakers debate federal employee pay, some are calling for a restructuring of the General Schedule.
The National Treasury Employees Union says the pay system does not need to be changed, but managers do need better training so they can do a better job of tracking performance and holding employees accountable.
"The General Schedule is a structured system. It has both merit and market-based components. Within-grade and career-ladder promotions are subject to merit standards. Non-performers can be denied merit pay increases," the Federal Times quoted Colleen Kelley, NTEU president, who was speaking at a March 9 hearing on federal pay.
However, groups including the Cato Institute and the Partnership for Public Service say the problem lies in federal managers believing that withholding a step increase "is not worth it," Losey said. Denying a pay raise could mean a manager spending months to fight appeals that could end up going to the Merit Systems Protection Board. It could also mean causing "strife in the workplace," Losey added.