Shows & Panels
Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- American Readiness: Renewable Power and Efficiency Technologies
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Delivering the Digital Government Mission
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal News Radio's National Cyber Security Awareness Month Special Panel Discussion
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Future of Government Data Centers
- The Future of IT: How CIOs Can Enable the Service-Oriented Enterprise
- Government Perspectives on Mobility and the Cloud
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Mitigating Insider Threats in Virtual & Cloud Environments
- Modern Mission Critical Series
- The New Generation of Database
- Reimagining the Next Generation of Government
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Air Traffic Management Transformation Report
- Cloud First Report
- General Dynamics IT Enterprise Center
- Gov Cloud Minute
- Government in Technology Series
- Homeland Security Cybersecurity Market Report
- National Cybersecurity Awareness Month
- Technology Insights
- The Cyber Security Report
- The Next Generation Cyber Security Experts
Shows & Panels
Achieving government reform...is it possible?
Tuesday - 10/11/2011, 4:05pm EDT
It's possible for your agency to be more effective than it currently is and not spend as much money. That's the argument of New York University professor Paul Light in a column in Government Executive.
Light writes, "...Americans are still convinced that the big problem in Washington is not the wrong priorities - unless Americans are asked whether the tax code should favor the super-wealthy. Rather, most believe the big problem is inefficiency in delivering basic goods and services at the lowest possible cost."
Light outlines three challenges government faces:
Agencies have too many layers of management, Light said.
"The total number of senior federal officers increased from 451 in 1960 to more than 2,600 in 2008," he wrote.
Having so many leaders makes it more difficult for federal employees to understand "where the buck stops."
One are of ineffectiveness has been in procurement. Government lacks acquisition officers to keep up with increased contracting.
"That's just a prescription for mismanaging money," said Tom Shoop, editor-in-chief of Government Executive, in an interview with In Depth with Francis Rose.
"Government's own employees don't have a high opinion of how leaders manage workforces," Shoop said.
Light advocates a pay-based performance system and calls for a 10 percent cap on the number of employees who receive the highest grade in performance ratings.