Shows & Panels
- The 2014 Big Picture on Cyber Security
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- Building the Hybrid Cloud
- Connected Government: How to Build and Procure Network Services for the Future
- Continuing Diagnostics and Mitigation: Discussion of Progress and Next Steps
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal Tech Talk
- The Intersection: Where Technology Meets Transformation
- Maximizing ROI Through Data Center Consolidation
- Moving to the Cloud. What's the best approach for me
- Navigating Tough Choices in Government Cloud Computing
- The New Generation of Database
- Satellite Communications: Acquiring SATCOM in Tight Times
- Targeting Advanced Threats: Proven Methods from Detection through Remediation
- Transformative Technology: Desktop Virtualization in Government
- The Truth About IT Opex and Software Defined Networking
- Value of Health IT
Shows & Panels
Former DHS IG placed on administrative leave following release of Senate report
Thursday - 4/24/2014, 12:52pm EDT
Updated April 24 at 6 p.m. to include a statement from DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson that Charles Edwards has been placed on administrative leave.
The former acting inspector general of the Homeland Security Department has been placed on administrative leave following the release of a Senate subcommittee report that says he "jeopardized the independence" of the office he once led.
In a statement provided to Federal News Radio, DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson said he placed former acting IG Charles Edwards on leave after reviewing the report released Thursday by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Financial and Contracting Oversight.
The report says Edwards altered or delayed reports to accommodate senior DHS officials, sought outside legal advice in violation of the laws governing agency IGs and failed to recuse himself from some audits despite concerns over conflicts of interest involving his wife, who was also employed by the agency.
Edwards resigned from his IG post in December just days before he was scheduled to testify before the subcommittee. He had been reassigned to the department's Science and Technology Directorate.
"Since I took office in December, I have made clear that injecting a new energy in the leadership of DHS is a top priority," Johnson said in the statement. "Since December, the Senate has confirmed seven of the President's nominees for senior positions in this Department, including myself and John Roth, our new inspector general. I have also made clear to our leadership that ethics in government, setting the example, and remaining above reproach are essential elements of good leadership."
Johnson said he has requested a briefing from the subcommittee's investigators.
No evidence of nepotism
The Senate panel, headed by Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Ron Johnson (R- Wis.), began investigating Edwards' tenure as IG last year.
The subcommittee received dozens of complaints about Edwards' conduct, according to Johnson and McCaskill's report, including that he allegedly abused agency resources, improperly used a government vehicle and violated anti-nepotism laws regarding his wife's employment at the agency.
The subcommittee's report cleared Edwards of the nepotism allegations, finding that his wife's employment at the IG's office predated his own and that Edwards did not intervene in helping her get approval to telework from India for extended periods of time. Edwards' use of a government vehicle also "appeared to comply" with DHS rules, the report stated. Many other allegations, such as whether he abused agency resources, could not be substantiated, the report stated.
Edwards has denied wrongdoing on all counts from the beginning, calling them "baseless allegations." Last summer, he told Federal News Radio he believed the Senate probe would clear his name.
Report: Edwards close with DHS officials supposed to oversee
Still, the panel's investigation concluded the IG office's independence eroded under Edwards' tenure.
"An Office of Inspector General is intended to be beyond reproach," Johnson said in a statement. "The problems in that office were allowed to persist for far too long."
Citing interviews with 35 current and former OIG officials and approximately 25,000 pages of emails and other documents, the report found Edwards maintained close, personal relationships with senior DHS officials, including the DHS chief of staff and DHS acting counsel.
"Mr. Edwards communicated frequently with DHS senior officials and considered them personal friends," the report stated.
In fact, Edwards socialized with senior political DHS officials. Emails cited in the report indicate Edwards set up drink and dinner plans with those officials on multiple occasions.
Edwards also frequently provided these officials with email updates on his office's investigations — email chains that excluded other members of the IG office, according to the report.
When interviewed by subcommittee staff later, a senior OIG official called the practice "concerning."
IG sought outside legal advice, according to investigators
The report also stated that Edwards frequently sought assistance from DHS acting counsel instead of the IGs own counsel, according to at least four former OIG officials. Federal law requires IGs to obtain legal advice only from their own lawyers or that of another agency's IG in order to maintain independence.
Nevertheless, in a March 2012 email to the agency's acting counsel, Edwards asked for help preparing his testimony before a House committee on DHS' fusion centers, according to the report.
In another case, the DHS acting counsel provided Edwards with "personal edits" to a memorandum of understanding between the OIG and the FBI even though DHS, itself, was not a party to the memo. Edwards was the only OIG official included on the email.