Shows & Panels
- AFCEA Answers
- Ask the CIO
- The Big Data Dilemma
- Carrying On with Continuity of Operations
- Connected Government
- Constituent Servicing
- Continuous Monitoring: Tools and Techniques for Trustworthy Government IT
- The Cyber Imperative
- Cyber Solutions for 2013 and Beyond
- The Data Privacy Imperative: Safeguarding Sensitive Data
- Expert Voices
- Federal Executive Forum
- Federal IT Challenge
- Federal Tech Talk
- Mission-critical Apps in the Cloud
- The Modern Federal Threat Landscape
- The Path from Legacy Systems
- The Real Deal on Digital Government
- The Reality of Continuous Monitoring... Is Your Agency Secure?
- Veterans in Private Sector: Making the Transition
Shows & Panels
Plan to prevent sequestration unlikely before election
Wednesday - 1/18/2012, 11:13am EST
But any deal to avoid sequestration probably won't happen anytime before the election, said Erik Wasson, reporter for the Hill newspaper, said in an interview with The Federal Drive with Tom Temin.
"The election and the election will determine what the dynamics will be," Wasson said.
The first of the sequestration cuts are really the same overall discretionary spending level but with a shift in cuts to defense and national security, Wasson said.
"There really is an onus on defense hawks to try to come up with a solution," he said.
One of those defense hawks is Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), who represents a state with a heavy defense aviation presence, Wasson said.
Dicks said this week he expects a deal to prevent the sequestration process, but told the Seattle Times the plan could come after the election.
However, if GOP presidential Mitt Romney "turn up pressure" on President Obama about the planned cuts to defense, "they may be more impetus to resolve that," Wasson said.